1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf02902459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meson-nucleus scattering lengths and sigma-terms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…first proposed by Drukarev et al [6], and later re-justified by many authors [7], we get, from the requirement n * = ρ * , the very interesting relation σ N = 6m 0 , i.e., the pion-nucleon sigma term σ N is six times the average current quark mass m 0 . If one takes σ N = 45 MeV [8][9][10] and m 0 = (m u0 + m d0 )/2 = (5 + 10)/2 = 7.5 MeV [11], we confirm this result.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…first proposed by Drukarev et al [6], and later re-justified by many authors [7], we get, from the requirement n * = ρ * , the very interesting relation σ N = 6m 0 , i.e., the pion-nucleon sigma term σ N is six times the average current quark mass m 0 . If one takes σ N = 45 MeV [8][9][10] and m 0 = (m u0 + m d0 )/2 = (5 + 10)/2 = 7.5 MeV [11], we confirm this result.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, the method under consideration seems to be preferable compared to utilization of the Fubini-Furlan type sum rules in [-3-5]. This is seen, for example, from the fact that only the different manners, used in [3] and [5] for the estimate of the dispersion integral of the pion-nuclear scattering amplitude imaginary part, led to the essentially different results for a~N (26_+8 MeV and 57 _+6 MeV). Such a discrepancy gives an evidence of the significant uncertainty of the method used in those papers.…”
Section: +T8 2a12mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The values of σ N and y remain controversial [52][53][54]. In this paper, we take σ N = 45 MeV, which is the value obtained in a recent analysis [54], and consider values of y in the range of 0 − 0.6, which covers the values discussed in [52][53][54].…”
Section: A In-medium Condensatesmentioning
confidence: 99%