2019
DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.49.3.259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesocosm and Microcosm Experiments On the Feeding of Temperate Salt Marsh Foraminifera

Abstract: Agglutinated foraminifera dominate in temperate salt marsh sediment, making them key indicators for monitoring sea level and environmental changes. Little is known about the biology of these benthic foraminifera because of difficulties in distinguishing live from dead specimens in laboratory cultures. We present data from 10 years of laboratory experiments using comparisons of the agglutinant trochamminids Trochammina inflata and Entzia macrescens and the miliolid Miliammina fusca with the calcareous rotalids … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bacteria observed in the degradation vacuoles resembled those from other deep-sea foraminifera (Globobulimina pacifica and Uvigerina peregrina) and the shallow-dwelling genus Ammonia (Goldstein and Corliss, 1994). Salt-marsh foraminifera also feed on bacteria and detritus, as observed in TEM studies (Frail-Gauthier et al, 2019). Scavenging on bacteria has also been observed by other foraminifera from intertidal environments such as Ammonia tepida or Haynesina germanica (Pascal et al, 2008) and is a logical consequence from detritus feeding.…”
Section: Feeding On Other Bacteria and Contents Of Degradation Vacuolessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The bacteria observed in the degradation vacuoles resembled those from other deep-sea foraminifera (Globobulimina pacifica and Uvigerina peregrina) and the shallow-dwelling genus Ammonia (Goldstein and Corliss, 1994). Salt-marsh foraminifera also feed on bacteria and detritus, as observed in TEM studies (Frail-Gauthier et al, 2019). Scavenging on bacteria has also been observed by other foraminifera from intertidal environments such as Ammonia tepida or Haynesina germanica (Pascal et al, 2008) and is a logical consequence from detritus feeding.…”
Section: Feeding On Other Bacteria and Contents Of Degradation Vacuolessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…From this result, however, we infer that N. labradorica at this site is a deposit feeder, feeding on organic detritus and associated bacteria. The bacteria observed in the degradation vacuoles resembled those from other deep-sea foraminifera (Globobulimina pacifica and Uvigerina peregrina) and the shallow-dwelling genus Ammonia (Goldstein and Corliss, 1994). Salt-marsh foraminifera also feed on bacteria and detritus, as observed in TEM studies (Frail-Gauthier et al, 2019).…”
Section: Degradation Vacuoles Show a Large Number Of Sediment Particl...mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The bacteria observed in the degradation vacuoles resembled those from other deep-sea foraminifera (Globobulimina pacifica and Uvigerina peregrina) and the shallow-dwelling genus Ammonia (Goldstein and Corliss, 1994). Salt-marsh foraminifera also feed on bacteria and detritus, as observed in TEM studies (Frail-Gauthier et al, 2019). Scavenging on bacteria has also been observed by other foraminifera from intertidal environments such as Ammonia tepida or Haynesina germanica (Pascal et al, 2008) and is a logical consequence of detritus feeding.…”
Section: Degradation Vacuoles Show a Large Number Of Sediment Particl...mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This zonation typically becomes tighter in the higher part of the marsh (Gehrels, 1994;Scott et al, 2001;Chen et al, 2020), making the high salt marsh environment ideal for the precise reconstruction of past relative sea levels. Foraminifera are also extremely abundant in salt-marsh environments, where they typically account for 24-75% of the meiofaunal biomass (Frail-Gauthier et al, 2019). Diatoms, a group of siliceous testate algae, are also sometimes used for transfer function-based sea-level research, though unlike foraminifera their uppermost limit is not constrained to the zones of tidal reach (Gehrels et al, 2001).…”
Section: Field and Lab Workmentioning
confidence: 99%