2006
DOI: 10.2478/s11687-006-0036-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesocestoides litteratus (Batsch, 1786) (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea: Mesocestoididae) from the red fox: Morphological and 18S rDNA characterization of European isolates

Abstract: SummaryMesocestoides litteratus (Batsch, 1786) (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea: Mesocestoidae) is a common parasite of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and other carnivores across Europe. There has been considerable debate as to the validity of M. litteratus and other closely related, often sympatric species of Mesocestoides. We examine isolates of M. litteratus from red foxes in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Spain both morphometrically and by characterization of 18S rDNA. Morphometric ranges of all isolates confirmed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of its fast rate of evolution the ITS2 region continues to be applied for phylogenetic reconstructions at the species and genus levels (Alvarez and Wendel 2003;Wolf et al 2005;Ashokan and Pillai 2008). In context of the cestode group of parasites the orders Cyclophyllidea, Pseudophyllidea, Caryophyllidea and Trypanorhyncha have been assessed on the basis of morphological, ultrastructural and ontogenetic characters (Hoberg et al 1997(Hoberg et al , 2001Beveridge et al 1999;Bray et al 1999) and several controversial phylogenetic disputes of cestode parasites have been published (Haukisalmi et al 2001;Literak et al 2006). Since in contrast to the bordering regions of ribosomal subunits; sequence is not conserved evolutionarily, thus genetic differentiation is detectable even in closely related groups of organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its fast rate of evolution the ITS2 region continues to be applied for phylogenetic reconstructions at the species and genus levels (Alvarez and Wendel 2003;Wolf et al 2005;Ashokan and Pillai 2008). In context of the cestode group of parasites the orders Cyclophyllidea, Pseudophyllidea, Caryophyllidea and Trypanorhyncha have been assessed on the basis of morphological, ultrastructural and ontogenetic characters (Hoberg et al 1997(Hoberg et al , 2001Beveridge et al 1999;Bray et al 1999) and several controversial phylogenetic disputes of cestode parasites have been published (Haukisalmi et al 2001;Literak et al 2006). Since in contrast to the bordering regions of ribosomal subunits; sequence is not conserved evolutionarily, thus genetic differentiation is detectable even in closely related groups of organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplification of partial sequence of 18S rDNA was made using primers WormA (5′-GCGAATGGCTCAT TAAATCAG-3′)/1270R (5′-CCGTCAATTCCTTTA AGTTT-3′) (Littlewood and Olson 2001) in the following thermocycling conditions: 94°C/5 min-initial denaturation; 94°C/1 min, 52°C/1 min, and 72°C/2 min-40 cycles; 72°C/7 min-final extending (Literak et al 2006). The PCR reaction (25 μl) was performed usingthe following PCR mix: 2 μl of genomic DNA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 200 μM of each dNTP, 150 pmol of each primer, and two units of Taq polymerase (Qiagen).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies by Literak et al (2004Literak et al ( , 2006, Tenora (2005), and Hrckova et al (2011) (Andras and Peter 2002;Segovia et al 2003;Martinez-Carrasco et al 2007;Krone et al 2008;Magi et al 2009). Additionally, almost nothing is known about the ranges of their intermediate and paratenic hosts in natural conditions (Literak et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the use of these new tools has also led to submission of haplotypes without proper morphological characters for identifications (Foronda et al 2007;Padgett et al 2013). To date, only three representatives of the genus-Mesocestoides litteratus (Batsch, 1786), M. lineatus (Goeze, 1782), and M. corti (Hoeppli, 1925) (= M. vogae (Etges 1991)-can reliably be identified as valid species, using both morphological and molecular characters Gubány and Eszterbauer 1998;Nickisch-Rosenegk et al 1999;Literák et al 2006;Hrčkova et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%