2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-015-0013-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meshing strategies for the alleviation of mesh-induced effects in cohesive element models

Abstract: One of the main approaches for modeling fracture and crack propagation in solid materials is adaptive insertion of cohesive elements, in which line-like (2D) or surface-like (3D) elements are inserted into the finite element mesh to model the nucleation and propagation of failure surfaces. In this approach, however, cracks are forced to propagate along element boundaries, following paths that in general require more energy per unit crack extension (greater driving forces) than those followed in the original co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the cohesive approach has been used to successfully represent crack initiation, extension, branching, and coalescence in a variety of problems, it suffers from mesh sensitivity because the crack path is limited to element boundaries. This may result in a lack of spatial convergence between an ideal crack path and its discrete representation, increasing the energy required to open the crack and limiting the model's accuracy [37,40]. Consequently, the crack path may be influenced by the existence of energetically-favorable extension directions [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the cohesive approach has been used to successfully represent crack initiation, extension, branching, and coalescence in a variety of problems, it suffers from mesh sensitivity because the crack path is limited to element boundaries. This may result in a lack of spatial convergence between an ideal crack path and its discrete representation, increasing the energy required to open the crack and limiting the model's accuracy [37,40]. Consequently, the crack path may be influenced by the existence of energetically-favorable extension directions [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may result in a lack of spatial convergence between an ideal crack path and its discrete representation, increasing the energy required to open the crack and limiting the model's accuracy [37,40]. Consequently, the crack path may be influenced by the existence of energetically-favorable extension directions [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that a 4k structured mesh consists of sets of four isosceles right triangles within a rectangular domain. Rimoli and Rojas addressed bias in 4k structured meshes and proposed a strategy to alleviate mesh dependence using barycentric subdivision with k ‐means meshes, named as a conjugate‐directions mesh. Alternatively, polygonal elements were utilized to solve dynamic fracture problems .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, nodal perturbation and edge‐swap operators have been proposed to unstructure the geometry and topology of the 4k mesh, respectively, and to reduce the error in crack path convergence . These operators significantly reduce the error in the crack path; however, the mesh still introduces unwarranted anisotropies into the problem domain .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unstructured, conjugate‐directions mesh is presented by Rimoli and coworkers . They use a barycentric subdivision of the k‐means mesh to construct a new mesh that has the same isotropic property of the k‐means mesh, but has more potential crack directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%