Proceedings of the 16th International Meshing Roundtable
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75103-8_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meshing 3D Domains Bounded by Piecewise Smooth Surfaces*

Abstract: This paper proposes an algorithm to mesh 3D domains bounded by piecewise smooth surfaces. The algorithm handle multivolume domains defined by surfaces that may be non connected or non manifold. The boundary and subdivision surfaces are assumed to be described by a complex formed by surface patches stitched together along curve segments. The meshing algorithm is a Delaunay refinement and it uses the notion of restricted Delaunay triangulation to approximate the input curve segments and surface patches. The algo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to achieve this goal is to keep the boundary elements while meshing the input domain after meshing or remeshing the input surface boundary. An alternative way is to operate the surface and volume mesh instantaneously by getting new boundary mesh through restricted Delaunay triangulation [53], which is a preferred solution for computational mesh generation.…”
Section: Tetrahedral Mesh Generation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to achieve this goal is to keep the boundary elements while meshing the input domain after meshing or remeshing the input surface boundary. An alternative way is to operate the surface and volume mesh instantaneously by getting new boundary mesh through restricted Delaunay triangulation [53], which is a preferred solution for computational mesh generation.…”
Section: Tetrahedral Mesh Generation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its flexibility, we use the Delaunay refinement package [10] of CGAL 4 . In particular, it was possible to provide our own type for D and our own set of criteria to classify triangles as bad.…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delaunay-based approaches [8,24] for meshing this domain have been able to provide topological correctness guarantees using either weighted Delaunay triangulations [8] or bounding the angle deviations between smooth patches [24]. A missing piece to the implementations of these algorithms is the ability to adapt to a sizing field, primarily because there is no consensus on what is the correct sizing field for non-smooth shapes and how best to compute it.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%