2004
DOI: 10.1002/nme.943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meshfree implementation for the real‐space electronic‐structure calculation of crystalline solids

Abstract: SUMMARYA meshfree formulation of the Schrödinger equation having periodic potential is presented. The conventional meshfree shape function is modified to express properly the periodicity of Bravais lattice. Then, it is applied to the electronic-structure calculation of crystalline solids in real space. Numerical examples are the Kronig-Penney model potential and the empirical pseudopotentials of diamond and zinc-blende semiconductors. Results prove that the meshfree method is a promising one to be used as a re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern partition of unity finite element (PUFE) methods provide an elegant and highly efficient solution to the quantum-mechanical problem. Jun [55] has reported non-self-consistent results using a meshfree basis to solve the Schrödinger equation in periodic solids, whereas Chen and coworkers [56] and Suryanarayana and coworkers [57] have employed meshfree partitionof-unity basis functions in full self-consistent calculations. Finite element basis functions as the partition-of-unity, however, offer significant advantages: locality is retained to the maximum extent possible, which facilitates parallel implementation, variational convergence is ensured by the minmax theorem [25], numerical integration errors can be strictly controlled, and Dirichlet as well as periodic boundary conditions are readily imposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern partition of unity finite element (PUFE) methods provide an elegant and highly efficient solution to the quantum-mechanical problem. Jun [55] has reported non-self-consistent results using a meshfree basis to solve the Schrödinger equation in periodic solids, whereas Chen and coworkers [56] and Suryanarayana and coworkers [57] have employed meshfree partitionof-unity basis functions in full self-consistent calculations. Finite element basis functions as the partition-of-unity, however, offer significant advantages: locality is retained to the maximum extent possible, which facilitates parallel implementation, variational convergence is ensured by the minmax theorem [25], numerical integration errors can be strictly controlled, and Dirichlet as well as periodic boundary conditions are readily imposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, for the trial and test functions to be admissible in the weak formulation (9), they must span a subspace of the Bloch-periodic space V, i.e., satisfy the Bloch-periodic boundary condition (3b). Referring to (16), this can be accomplished in two distinct ways:…”
Section: Schrödinger Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have also been implementations of the method with £nite elements [127,177], and even meshless methods [79]. Finite element discretization methods may be successful in reducing the total number of variables involved, but they are far more dif£cult to implement.…”
Section: Finite Differences In Real Spacementioning
confidence: 99%