2004
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesh‐free radial point interpolation method for the buckling analysis of Mindlin plates subjected to in‐plane point loads

Abstract: SUMMARYIn this paper, a mesh-free approach is employed for buckling analysis of Mindlin plates that are subjected to in-plane point loads. The radial point interpolation method (RPIM) is used to approximate displacements based on nodes. Variational forms of the system equations are established. Two-step solution procedures are implemented. The non-uniform pre-stress distribution of plate is first obtained using the RPIM based on a two-dimensional (2D) elastic plane stress problem. This predetermined non-unifor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The square definition domain with edge length 2.0h was used in the original RPI approximation given by Wang et al [11,13], where h was the maximum distance among neighbouring nodes. In Liew and Chen [29,30] work, the size of the quadrilateral definition domain was taken as three times of the average nodal distance.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The square definition domain with edge length 2.0h was used in the original RPI approximation given by Wang et al [11,13], where h was the maximum distance among neighbouring nodes. In Liew and Chen [29,30] work, the size of the quadrilateral definition domain was taken as three times of the average nodal distance.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hon et al further extended the method to solve various non-linear initial plate. Liew and Chen [29,30] solved the buckling problems of Mindlin plates with the RPI method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, we have developed a meshfree approach in order to capture the non-linear responses of shell-like structures in CNT. For general reviews on the meshfree and particle methods and application to shell and plate structures, we refer to the work described in [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Comparing with the standard continuum treatment of shell or plate, an important difference in the developed meshfree approach in this paper is the fact that the "thickness" of the single layer of CNT is considered to be zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several meshless methods: the diffuse element method [2], the element-free Galerkin (EFG) method [3], the Hp clouds method [4], the harmonic reproducing kernel particle method [5], the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method [6], the multi-scale reproducing kernel particle method [7][8][9], the wavelet particle method [10], the radial point interpolation method [11][12][13], the complex variable meshless method [14], the boundary element-free method [15][16][17][18], the moving least-squares differential quadrature meshfree method [19,20]. The common feature of these methods, of which the EFG method is the most widely applied, is that they do not use predefined meshes, at least for field variable interpolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%