Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesh-free method for numerical solution of the multi-group discrete ordinate neutron transport equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it can be seen that regarding the 4th eigenflux, the shape is similar. The following case corresponds to an homogeneous BWR cell [15,16]. The consideration of the upscattering in this case is one of the reasons why it was selected for this work.…”
Section: Mox Benchmark Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it can be seen that regarding the 4th eigenflux, the shape is similar. The following case corresponds to an homogeneous BWR cell [15,16]. The consideration of the upscattering in this case is one of the reasons why it was selected for this work.…”
Section: Mox Benchmark Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case2: control rods half-inserted. A comparison of the multiplication factors, where the reference value was obtained with Monte Carlo method, is shown in table 16. FDM Diffusion result is also added in the comparison table.…”
Section: Fbr Takeda Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrete ordinates radiation transport equation has been solved previously using meshless methods, including for collocation methods [11,12,13,14,15,16] and the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method [17,18]. The collocation methods often use the second-order form of the radiation transport equation, such as the self-adjoint angular flux equation [19], while the MLPG methods use a background mesh for the integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen 2D cases are: first a MOX test problem found in [Capilla et al, 2008], the second one is a simple BWR cell test problem found in [Stepanek et al, 1982], [Kashi et al, 2017], the next one is the BWR rod bundle test also from [Kashi et al, 2017] and the last one is the common 2D C5G7 bechmark [Smith et al, 2003].…”
Section: Numerical Results For Criticality Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second case is a homogeneous BWR cell [Stepanek et al, 1982, Kashi et al, 2017. This case has been selected due to the fact that it is modeled with upscattering.…”
Section: Bwr Cell Test Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%