2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesenteric stenosis, collaterals, and compensatory blood flow

Abstract: This study shows that stenosis in either the CA or SMA increases flow velocities in the other unaffected mesenteric artery. This increase was correlated with the presence of collaterals. Collaterals and stenoses in one of the mesenteric arteries may lead to mimicking or overgrading of stenosis in the other mesenteric artery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
40
2
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
40
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Collateral pathways among the visceral branches provide protective redundancy and enable the patient to remain asymptomatic if blood flow within a branch vessel is compromised. 2,6 In individu- …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collateral pathways among the visceral branches provide protective redundancy and enable the patient to remain asymptomatic if blood flow within a branch vessel is compromised. 2,6 In individu- …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this group of patients, flow in the IMA is likely to be higher. Whether the presence of collaterals is indicative of ischemia development, or conversely, that the lack of collaterals indicates the absence of ischemia, remains to be confirmed (Van Petersen et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After coverage of the CA, elevated SMA velocities may be observed in certain patients related to a change in flow patterns due to increased compensatory blood flow in the unaffected vessel and decreased peripheral resistance from the collateral circuit supplying the remainder of the viscera. 10 Evaluation of symptoms and weight loss, increased velocity of the SMA, and radiographic findings should be considered to ensure adequate abdominal perfusion or need for reintervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%