2003
DOI: 10.1080/00071773.2003.11007395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merleau-Ponty and the other World of Painting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Since spontaneous perception can take the disenchanted form of vision that is the source of the modern scientific outlook, Larsen concludes that "there is no pure perceptual world that a scientistic metaphysics comes to colonize, that the world of perception in modernity always already is the scientific world". 20 It is not possible, then, to maintain a distinction between spontaneous vision and scientific construction, a distinction, moreover, upon which Merleau-Ponty's phenomenological project and view of painting rest. This is a provocative conclusion, yet the entire argument turns on the way Larsen understands Merleau-Ponty's assertion that "perception already stylizes".…”
Section: David Johnsonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…19 Since spontaneous perception can take the disenchanted form of vision that is the source of the modern scientific outlook, Larsen concludes that "there is no pure perceptual world that a scientistic metaphysics comes to colonize, that the world of perception in modernity always already is the scientific world". 20 It is not possible, then, to maintain a distinction between spontaneous vision and scientific construction, a distinction, moreover, upon which Merleau-Ponty's phenomenological project and view of painting rest. This is a provocative conclusion, yet the entire argument turns on the way Larsen understands Merleau-Ponty's assertion that "perception already stylizes".…”
Section: David Johnsonmentioning
confidence: 97%