2008
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merkel cell carcinoma

Abstract: BACKGROUND. Currently, little is known regarding the potential prognostic value of histologic features in primary cutaneous neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinomas (MCC). METHODS. In a retrospective review of the tumor histology and clinical outcome data (median follow‐up, 51 months; range, 3‐224 months) of 156 patients with a diagnosis of MCC, the following histologic features were evaluated: tumor thickness, tumor size (greatest dimension of the tumor), microanatomic compartment involved by tumor (dermis and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prognosis in MCC is historically directed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, but this remains controversial because conclusive evidence that stage is the most rigorous surrogate of outcome for all patients is lacking (4, 6, 7, 25, 26). Additional biologically meaningful biomarkers predictive of clinical outcome in MCC have thus been investigated, but with similarly controversial and inconsistent conclusions (25, 27, 28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Prognosis in MCC is historically directed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, but this remains controversial because conclusive evidence that stage is the most rigorous surrogate of outcome for all patients is lacking (4, 6, 7, 25, 26). Additional biologically meaningful biomarkers predictive of clinical outcome in MCC have thus been investigated, but with similarly controversial and inconsistent conclusions (25, 27, 28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional biologically meaningful biomarkers predictive of clinical outcome in MCC have thus been investigated, but with similarly controversial and inconsistent conclusions (25, 27, 28). More recent efforts have implicated the tumor-associated immune cell infiltrate as a potentially robust indicator of clinical behavior in MCC (4, 26). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 An additional population-based cohort study from Finland using a different approach further supports an independent prognostic role for IT-CD8+ as well as CD3+ lymphocytes in MCC. 12 Classic H&E evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has previously shown univariate but not independent significance 11,13 ; these studies are limited by technical difficulties in differentiating small, round, blue tumor cells from small, round, blue lymphocytes, particularly in the tumor field. We therefore suggest that immunohistochemical evaluation of cytotoxic intratumoral T-cell infiltration is a more sensitive means to assess the antitumor response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the primary tumor below 2.0 cm is associated with better prognosis, unfortunately, because of the very rapid proliferation of tumor cells, and diagnostic difficulties delaying diagnosis, in most cases, patients are diagnosed with MCC at the stage when the primary lesion exceeds 2.0 cm [19]. The classification of TMN American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) proposed a clinical staging of MCC (0 to IV) [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%