2001
DOI: 10.1300/j122v21n01_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging Science/Technology Libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lessin's article, a more theoretical, historical discussion, is aimed at helping library managers guide decision-making; it is not a step-by-step discussion of the process. 1 His is a positive response to the potentially negative action of merging libraries. He reminds his readers that patrons may not be happy with such decisions, but the LRTS 54 (3) electronic environment provides access to literature regardless of the physical location of materials, especially in a library that provides information in science, technology, and medicine.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lessin's article, a more theoretical, historical discussion, is aimed at helping library managers guide decision-making; it is not a step-by-step discussion of the process. 1 His is a positive response to the potentially negative action of merging libraries. He reminds his readers that patrons may not be happy with such decisions, but the LRTS 54 (3) electronic environment provides access to literature regardless of the physical location of materials, especially in a library that provides information in science, technology, and medicine.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Lessin's article on merging science/technology libraries provides an excellent analysis of why various branch library merge, and discusses the Crerar/Chicago merger and University of Louisville libraries among others. 18 Zhou discusses the advantages of reference desk mergers at California State University, Sacramento. 19 Dodd gives good advice on strategic planning with architects and administrators.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%