2020
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-3115-0.ch023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging Explicit Declarations With Implicit Response Time to Better Predict Behavior

Abstract: Declarations and actions do not always overlap, and thus, predicting future behavior solely on the basis of self-reported measures seems to be ineffective. The authors propose a confidence index (CI): a measure based on Fazio's attitude accessibility model. CI integrates explicit and implicit perspectives and captures how long a person hesitates when stating an opinion. The more certain someone is the stronger the attitude-behavior link is likely to be. A study was conducted to uncover differences in attitudes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Besides data on socio-demographics (e.g., gender, occupation, income) and Covid-19 exposure, the responses regarding the 50 statements were structured on a 3 point scale (yes (Y), hard to tell, no (N)). Here, we adjust responses further in function of response time (RT) collected through an iCode Smart test (Ohme et al, 2020). In practice, hard to tell is coded as 0; reaction time data are rescaled by the z-score, z, of log(RT), with mean = 0 and two standard deviations = 1, with a positive answer Yes is z(Y) = 1 -z and a positive No becomes z(No) = z -1.…”
Section: Sample and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Besides data on socio-demographics (e.g., gender, occupation, income) and Covid-19 exposure, the responses regarding the 50 statements were structured on a 3 point scale (yes (Y), hard to tell, no (N)). Here, we adjust responses further in function of response time (RT) collected through an iCode Smart test (Ohme et al, 2020). In practice, hard to tell is coded as 0; reaction time data are rescaled by the z-score, z, of log(RT), with mean = 0 and two standard deviations = 1, with a positive answer Yes is z(Y) = 1 -z and a positive No becomes z(No) = z -1.…”
Section: Sample and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, but not least, our analysis uses an online survey which makes us at the mercy of the validity of the answers provided. We leverage a powerful data collection technique based on the neuroeconomics field to both filter the non-credible answers and assess the information strength of the answers received (Ohme et al, 2020). Neuro-economics suggest among others that people's speed of answers guides the reliability of the information responses.…”
Section: Article Scope and Fit With The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuro-economics suggest among others that people's speed of answers guides the reliability of the information responses. Our analysis uses an algorithm (Ohme et al, 2020) that measures both, the explicit answer as well as the speed of answering making it possible to identify the confidence of attitudes.…”
Section: Article Scope and Fit With The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, this shift allows us to collect more data at different stages of the customer journey, which further allows us to analyze behavior in ways that were not previously available (Malter et al, 2020;Tong et al, 2020). Not only have technological advancements changed the nature of consumption but they have also significantly influenced the methods used in consumer research by adding both new sources of data and improved analytical tools (Ding et al, 2020;Ohme et al, 2020). The adoption of contemporary methods in consumer data analytics is slow and many businesses fail to understand their consumers as well as they want.…”
Section: Consumer Behavior Research (Cbr)mentioning
confidence: 99%