2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2015.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging advanced technologies with classical methods to uncover dendritic spine dynamics: A hot spot of synaptic plasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
(171 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been some preliminary evidence supporting disease-related changes in dendritic spine subtypes, classified conventionally as stubby, mushroom, and thin (Jones and Powell, 1969 ) in cortical neurons from a TDP-43 rodent model (Handley et al, 2017 ). Limitations of the light microscopic method (Harris et al, 1992 ; Arellano et al, 2007 ; Maiti et al, 2015 ) and evidence of a continuum of intermediate spine morphologies in past reports (Peters and Kaiserman-Abramof, 1970 ; Harris et al, 1992 ; Maiti et al, 2015 ) have precluded a robust and repeatable taxonomy of dendritic spines in material from the present study. Although there may be inherent limitations with differential impregnation of neurons with Golgi-Cox in case of neuro-degeneration, evidence from the literature demonstrates successful staining in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases (Ukabam, 1988 ; Spires et al, 2004 ) and human post-mortem tissue in cases of aging and Alzheimer's disease (Hanks and Flood, 1991 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There has been some preliminary evidence supporting disease-related changes in dendritic spine subtypes, classified conventionally as stubby, mushroom, and thin (Jones and Powell, 1969 ) in cortical neurons from a TDP-43 rodent model (Handley et al, 2017 ). Limitations of the light microscopic method (Harris et al, 1992 ; Arellano et al, 2007 ; Maiti et al, 2015 ) and evidence of a continuum of intermediate spine morphologies in past reports (Peters and Kaiserman-Abramof, 1970 ; Harris et al, 1992 ; Maiti et al, 2015 ) have precluded a robust and repeatable taxonomy of dendritic spines in material from the present study. Although there may be inherent limitations with differential impregnation of neurons with Golgi-Cox in case of neuro-degeneration, evidence from the literature demonstrates successful staining in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases (Ukabam, 1988 ; Spires et al, 2004 ) and human post-mortem tissue in cases of aging and Alzheimer's disease (Hanks and Flood, 1991 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In both the ethanol-consuming and water-consuming control groups, our quantification included examples of the full array of conventional dendritic spine classifications, including thin, stubby, and mushroom (Jones and Powell, 1969; Peters and Kaiserman-Abramof, 1970). Limitations in our confocal light microscopy (Harris et al, 1992; Arellano et al, 2007; Maiti et al, 2015) and the large variability and prevalence of intermediate spine forms precluded unequivocal categorization of our samples. Indeed, past reports argue that spines exist as a continuum of structures rather than as discrete units (Peters and Kaiserman-Abramof, 1970; Harris et al, 1992; Maiti et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations in our confocal light microscopy (Harris et al, 1992; Arellano et al, 2007; Maiti et al, 2015) and the large variability and prevalence of intermediate spine forms precluded unequivocal categorization of our samples. Indeed, past reports argue that spines exist as a continuum of structures rather than as discrete units (Peters and Kaiserman-Abramof, 1970; Harris et al, 1992; Maiti et al, 2015). In addition to our dendritic spine density changes, increased sEPSC frequency and a reduction in the cumulative probability of the sIPSC interevent interval was also observed in mPFC LVPNs from ethanol-consuming rats compared with controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This staining method was the sole technique that could visualize neurons at that time. On the basis of this technological background, more modified and developed staining methods, such as Golgi-Cox, rapid Golgi, and Golgi-Kopsch staining, were invented and extensively used in research of various specimens (Maiti et al, 2015). Thus, there are approximately 3000 publications that used Golgi staining between 1965 and1999.…”
Section: Introduction History Of Golgi Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%