Mereotopological Analysis of Formal Concepts in Security Ontologies

Aranda-Corral, Gonzalo A.; Borrego-Dí­az, Joaquín

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16626-6_4

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The approach presented does not attempt to combine both theories, just use a translation of DL to QSR to facilitate user interaction by visual reasoning. This approach was successful in previous case studies [4].…”

Section: Closing Remarks and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 65%

Repairing conceptual relations in ontologies by means of an interactive visual reasoning: Cognitive and design principles

Aranda-Corral

Borrego-Díaz

Chávez-González

2012

2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The technologies of visual representation are a great help for understanding items of information and the relations among them, especially, for non-expert users on Knowledge Based Systems, e.g. ontologies, which represent a world that can evolve and, therefore, has to be eventually refined. To ensure a cognitive communication soundness, we must integrate into solutions both, usability for these non-expert users and a logical accuracy on all involved elements. In this paper, the design principles for a tool for the visual repair of anomalies in consistent ontologies is presented. It helps users to obtain an ontological agreement between his mental model of the concepts into discourse domain and the intended model of the ontology (that is supposed to be consistent).

show abstract

Section: Closing Remarks and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 65%

Repairing conceptual relations in ontologies by means of an interactive visual reasoning: Cognitive and design principles

Aranda-Corral

Borrego-Díaz

Chávez-González

2012

2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, SWT provide tools for analysing important features as, for instance, consistency, compliance with current Security Standards, as well as the fidelity with the intended model (see e.g. Aranda et al [3] in SIS, and Alonso et al [2] in general). The latter feature is based on a sound representation of some concepts, i.e.…”

Section: Semantic Methods For Sismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Also the flowchart concept appears in biotechnology ontologies as, e.g. in the National Cancer Institute Thesaurus, 2 Semanticscience Integrated Ontology 3 and SWEET Governance Ontology 4 , among others approaches.…”

Section: Fig 1 Flowchart Box Element Classmentioning

confidence: 99%

Semantics for incident identification and resolution reports

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to achieve a safe and systematic treatment of security protocols, organizations release a number of technical briefings describing how to detect and manage security incidents. A critical issue is that this document set may suffer from semantic deficiencies, mainly due to ambiguity or different granularity levels of description and analysis. An approach to face this problem is the use of semantic methodologies in order to provide better Knowledge Externalization from incident protocols management. In this article, we propose a method based on semantic techniques for both, analyzing and specifying (meta)security requirements on protocols used for solving security incidents. This would allow specialist getting better documentation on their intangible knowledge about them.

show abstract

“…Ontological Engineering provides tools to analyze important features as consistency, compliance with current Security Standards, and fidelity to the intended model [1]. The latter is about the sound representation of some concepts, this means, whether the specification represents the intentions of security experts and there are not axioms nor properties clearly incompatible with real concepts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, the ontology-based approach enables the definition of security concepts and their dependencies in an understandable way for both, humans and software agents [11]. Beside consistency and complexity, the absence of representational anomalies is mandatory [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Specifying and Verifying Meta-Security by Means of Semantic Web Methods

Borrego-Díaz

Chávez-González

Pro-Martín

et al. 2014

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. In order to achieve a systematic treatment of security protocols, organizations release a number of technical briefings for describing how security incidents have to be managed. These documents can suffer semantic deficiencies, mainly due to ambiguity or different granularity levels of description and analysis. Ontological Engineering (OE) is a powerful instrument that can be applied for both, cleaning methods and knowledge in incident protocols, and specifying (meta)security requirements on protocols for solving security incidents. We also show how the ontology built from security reports can be used as the knowledge core for semantic systems in order to work with resolution incidents in a safe way. The method has been illustrated with a case study

show abstract

Mereotopological Analysis of Formal Concepts in Security Ontologies

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

Repairing conceptual relations in ontologies by means of an interactive visual reasoning: Cognitive and design principles

Repairing conceptual relations in ontologies by means of an interactive visual reasoning: Cognitive and design principles

Semantics for incident identification and resolution reports

Specifying and Verifying Meta-Security by Means of Semantic Web Methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About