2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021gl094695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury's Northern Rise Core‐Field Magnetic Anomaly

Abstract: Mercury is among the few terrestrial planetary bodies in our solar system with an active core magnetic field. Data collected by the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry and Ranging (MESSEN-GER) mission (Solomon et al., 2001) revealed that the internal magnetic field is symmetric with regard to Mercury's rotation axis but asymmetric with respect to the geographic equator (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the mantle plug loading at the Caloris region dominates the overall loading of the lithosphere in the region. This illustrates the difference between the compensation mechanisms in the Caloris basin (CrMB isostatic compensation) and the Northern rise regions (deep mantle compensation demonstrated by high admittance, also suggested in Plattner and Johnson (2021)). Nevertheless, the recent estimation of load depth under the Northern Rise region is about 29 ± 13 km (area 4 in Goossens et al (2022b)), which represents a shallow loading scenario.…”
Section: Lithospheric Elastic Thickness and Load State Of The Caloris...mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This means that the mantle plug loading at the Caloris region dominates the overall loading of the lithosphere in the region. This illustrates the difference between the compensation mechanisms in the Caloris basin (CrMB isostatic compensation) and the Northern rise regions (deep mantle compensation demonstrated by high admittance, also suggested in Plattner and Johnson (2021)). Nevertheless, the recent estimation of load depth under the Northern Rise region is about 29 ± 13 km (area 4 in Goossens et al (2022b)), which represents a shallow loading scenario.…”
Section: Lithospheric Elastic Thickness and Load State Of The Caloris...mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…If such an internal magnetic field structure with an m = 2 character and 88 day periodicity could be inferred from observations of Mercury's magnetic field, and recent papers (e.g., Plattner & Johnson 2021;Wardinski et al 2021) show that this might indeed be possible, then the strength of that magnetic field could inform on the Brunt-Väisälä frequency near the CMB, as well as the Ekman number in the outer core and the triaxial shape of the CMB. But, as the induced magnetic field results are based on a model assuming laminar flow, and we expect the flow near the CMB to be turbulent, further study is needed to take nonlinear interactions within the fluid into account and draw any definitive conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reconstructions of Mercury's magnetic field, inferred from MESSENGER magnetic field observations, show that nonaxisymmetric magnetic field components might contribute from 3% (Plattner & Johnson 2021) to 20% (Wardinski et al 2021) to the rms signal of the radial magnetic field at the core surface. The estimated Y 2 2 components of Mercury's stationary internal magnetic field (i.e., the g 2 2 and h 2 2 Gauss coefficients) are around 1 nT (Wardinski et al 2019), similar to the librationally induced periodic magnetic field we compute above for N 0 = 100, Ek = 2 × 10 −13 , and α 2 = 10 −4 , although its value is uncertain due to MESSENGER's orbital geometry (Anderson et al 2012;Thébault et al 2018;Toepfer et al 2022).…”
Section: Stratification Induces a Nonaxisymmetric Magnetic Field Stru...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility raised by James (2018) is that the cause of the northern rise lies deeper in Mercury, in the mantle or at the base of the crust. Recent analysis of magnetic data also hints at this (Plattner & Johnson 2021). In order to probe this, we reanalyzed the admittance curve for area 4, this time ensuring that the model has the load depth in the mantle (z > T c ), which also means a negative load parameter (Grott & Wieczorek 2012).…”
Section: Northern Risementioning
confidence: 97%