1981
DOI: 10.1016/0032-5910(81)85001-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury porosimetry: state of the art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0
11

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
102
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the pore size distribution of the samples, mercury porosimetry was applied (van Brakel et al 1981). The investigations were carried out with pressures up to 2 kbar, which allows the evaluation of pore radii of about 0.005 lm.…”
Section: Dimension Stones: Petrophysical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the pore size distribution of the samples, mercury porosimetry was applied (van Brakel et al 1981). The investigations were carried out with pressures up to 2 kbar, which allows the evaluation of pore radii of about 0.005 lm.…”
Section: Dimension Stones: Petrophysical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…van Brakel et al 1981). The pattern of the pore radii spectrum exhibit for both investigated marbles an unequal porous bimodal distribution of pore sizes (Fig.…”
Section: Pore Space Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The pore size distribution of the rocks was determined by using mercury porosimetry (Brakel et al 1981). The investigations were carried out with pressures up to 2 kbar, which allows the evaluation of pore radii of about 0.005 lm.…”
Section: Pore Radii Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%