2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury exosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also observed the dawn enhancement of K first noted by Sprague [1992], again indicating a strong mobilization of K by thermal processes. Leblanc and Doressoundiram [2011] assembled all available Mercury exospheric measurements of K and compared them with models that include temperature-driven diffusion and evaporation, photo-and electron desorption, and ion sputtering. Also included in the simulations were the effects of radiation pressure on atoms and the thermal effects of Mercury's eccentric orbit.…”
Section: Implications For the Exospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also observed the dawn enhancement of K first noted by Sprague [1992], again indicating a strong mobilization of K by thermal processes. Leblanc and Doressoundiram [2011] assembled all available Mercury exospheric measurements of K and compared them with models that include temperature-driven diffusion and evaporation, photo-and electron desorption, and ion sputtering. Also included in the simulations were the effects of radiation pressure on atoms and the thermal effects of Mercury's eccentric orbit.…”
Section: Implications For the Exospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such differences are not necessarily in conflict since Na ejection rates from Mercuryʼs surface are episodic in nature, due to both space weather (Orsini et al 2018) and stochastic meteoroid bombardment (Cassidy et al 2021), and it is unknown whether the K ejection varies proportionally. Leblanc & Doressoundiram (2011) modeled the potassium exosphere and concluded that differences in transport, loss, and desorption efficiencies can explain the spatial variation in Na/K. When these differences are considered, they asserted that Mercuryʼs high Na/K ratio may in fact be consistent with initial solar or meteoric abundance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exosphere of Mercury has also been examined in detail and contains ions and neutrals that originate from the solar wind interacting with the space environment and the planet’s surface. Evidence for excited alkali (Na), alkaline earth (Ca and Mg) atoms, H + , He + , He 2+ , Na + , and Ca + ions, and O, Al, K, and Fe atoms, was presented by Killen et al, , Vervack et al, Bida et al, Leblanc et al, and Raines et al Specifically, observations by the Mercury atmospheric and surface composition spectrometer (MACS) revealed the presence of neutral Mg in the antisunward region as well as differing spatial distributions of Mg, Ca, and Na atoms in both the tail and night side near the planet exosphere. Recent observations from the fast imaging plasma spectrometer (FIPS), taken <400 km from the surface, have shown a plasma cusp with energetic heavy ions (i.e., Na + and O + groups).…”
Section: Space-weathering Of Solar System Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 97%