2014
DOI: 10.17221/7711-cjas
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury bioaccumulation in hair and skin of arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) and silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in rural and urbanized region

Abstract: Mercury bioaccumulation in hair and skin of silver and arctic foxes farmed in typically rural and urbanized regions (Wielkopolskie Voivodship, Poland) was assessed. Hair and skin samples were collected and analyzed for total Hg content using atomic absorption spectrometry. Hairs and skin of foxes farmed in the rural region accumulated higher amount of Hg compared to animals from the urbanized one. Species effect (lower Hg concentration in V. lagopus) was noted, females having higher accumulation compared with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another good example of an environmental pollution bioindicator is toxic metals concentration in animal hair. The values obtained are relatively lower compared to other domestic animals [3,[41][42], but similar to the results of previous studies [39]. It is interesting that mercury content in horse hair is positively and significantly correlated with other investigated elements, such as arsenic, silicon, phosphorus, sulfur, and selenium [43].…”
Section: Statistical Analysessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Another good example of an environmental pollution bioindicator is toxic metals concentration in animal hair. The values obtained are relatively lower compared to other domestic animals [3,[41][42], but similar to the results of previous studies [39]. It is interesting that mercury content in horse hair is positively and significantly correlated with other investigated elements, such as arsenic, silicon, phosphorus, sulfur, and selenium [43].…”
Section: Statistical Analysessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is, therefore, appropriate to pay attention to other, especially non-invasive monitoring methods that do not request killing. Animal hair analysis is commonly used for the purpose of environmental pollution monitoring [28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%