2021
DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2021.1999679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercenaries in/and history: the problem of ahistoricism and contextualism in mercenary scholarship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contingent approaches' concern with 'context and indeterminacy' 32 risks throwing the historical baby out with its bathwater: engendering 'a sovereign politics of time' by inscribing 'temporal borders' 33 between periods. In stressing past times' 'radical "otherness"' , 34 contingent approaches institute artificial barriers between them. Scholarship operationalising the past in terms of 'discontinuity, contingency, and particularity' 35 ends up 'cutting' 36 history into a series of disconnected chunks: a 'butterfly of contingent hiccoughs' , 37 rather than an intricate and interpellated whole.…”
Section: Security Studies' Dual Problem With the Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingent approaches' concern with 'context and indeterminacy' 32 risks throwing the historical baby out with its bathwater: engendering 'a sovereign politics of time' by inscribing 'temporal borders' 33 between periods. In stressing past times' 'radical "otherness"' , 34 contingent approaches institute artificial barriers between them. Scholarship operationalising the past in terms of 'discontinuity, contingency, and particularity' 35 ends up 'cutting' 36 history into a series of disconnected chunks: a 'butterfly of contingent hiccoughs' , 37 rather than an intricate and interpellated whole.…”
Section: Security Studies' Dual Problem With the Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%