2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9dt00498j
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercapto-benzothiazolyl based ruthenium(ii) borate complexes: synthesis and reactivity towards various phosphines

Abstract: Ruthenium complexes featuring phosphinate and dual Ru⋯H–B interactions between Ru and B–H bonds of borate ligands supported by mercapto-benzothiazolyl heterocycles have been synthesized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the C10−C11 and C10−O1 bond distances of 1.547(5) Å and 1.391(4) Å, respectively correspond to single bonds. The short P1−O2 bond distance (1.516(3) Å) supports P=O double bond character [17d,18b,d,f] and the Rh1−P1 bond distance (2.216(1) Å) is rather short. A strong hydrogen bond (C)−OH⋅⋅⋅O(=P) (O1−O2 distance of 2.595(4) Å; O1−H1A−O2 angle of 134.3°) [22] is observed between the hydroxyalkyl and the phosphoryl ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Accordingly, the C10−C11 and C10−O1 bond distances of 1.547(5) Å and 1.391(4) Å, respectively correspond to single bonds. The short P1−O2 bond distance (1.516(3) Å) supports P=O double bond character [17d,18b,d,f] and the Rh1−P1 bond distance (2.216(1) Å) is rather short. A strong hydrogen bond (C)−OH⋅⋅⋅O(=P) (O1−O2 distance of 2.595(4) Å; O1−H1A−O2 angle of 134.3°) [22] is observed between the hydroxyalkyl and the phosphoryl ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Similarly, as shown in Scheme , treatment of 1 a – d with [H 2 B(mbz) 2 ] − led to the formation of N,S‐chelating Ru species, [(κ 2 ‐N,S‐L)PR 3 Ru{κ 3 ‐H,S,S ’ −H 2 B(L) 2 }], ( 2 a’ : R=Ph, 2 b’ : R=Cy, 2 c’ : R=OMe, 2 d’ : R=OPh; L=C 7 H 4 NS 2 ). The chelating complexes were isolated as crystalline solids and were characterized by 1 H, 11 B{ 1 H}, 13 C{ 1 H}, 31 P{ 1 H} NMR as well as IR spectroscopy and in some cases by X‐ray crystallographic analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bidentate N,S‐donor group forms a four‐membered chelate ring with a bite angle of 67.08(13)°, comparable to that of [(PPh 3 ) 2 )Ru( N , S ‐mbz) 2 )] (67.295(11)°) . The Ru1‐S6‐C21‐N3 ring is almost flat with a torsion angle of −0.7(5)°, larger than that of 2 d’ (−3.5(4)°) . The Ru1−S6 distance of 2.4741(18) Å in 2 a’ is significantly longer than the Ru1−S2 and Ru1−S4 distances in 2 a’ (2.3268(18) and 2.3469(16) Å respectively) and other ruthenium complexes .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the role of ancillary ligands in the stability of the TM σ-borate complexes, the reaction of [( p -cymene)­RuCl 2 (PR 3 )] with Na­[H 2 B­(C 7 H 4 NS 2 ) 2 ] ( p -cymene = η 6 -( p - i PrC 6 H 4 Me)) was performed, yielding the ruthenium σ-borate complexes [(κ N ,κ S -C 7 H 4 NS 2 )­(R 3 P)­RuH 2 B­(L) 2 }] (R = Ph ( 33a ), OPh ( 33b )) and the bis­(σ-borate) complex [Ru­(H 2 B­(C 7 H 4 NS 2 ) 2 ) 2 ] ( 34 ) (Scheme ). , The presence of upfield 1 H NMR chemical shifts at ca. −15 ppm suggested the presence of a Ru– H –B unit.…”
Section: Tetracoordinate σ-Borane/borate Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%