2020
DOI: 10.4193/rhin20.416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mepolizumab for eosinophilic chronic sinusitis with nasal polyposis: real-life experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of MEP were studied first in randomized controlled trials (RCT) [ 16 , 17 , 18 ] and then in real-life studies [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], confirming its efficacy and providing useful information on some aspects such as its pharmacoeconomics and the effect on comorbidities [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The effect of MEP was clearly demonstrated in patients with eosinophilic severe asthma with a cell count greater than 300/μL in the 12 months prior to the drug’s administration and at least 150 at the time of the first dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of MEP were studied first in randomized controlled trials (RCT) [ 16 , 17 , 18 ] and then in real-life studies [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], confirming its efficacy and providing useful information on some aspects such as its pharmacoeconomics and the effect on comorbidities [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The effect of MEP was clearly demonstrated in patients with eosinophilic severe asthma with a cell count greater than 300/μL in the 12 months prior to the drug’s administration and at least 150 at the time of the first dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-life data has also suggested that mepolizumab is equally effective in patients with and without certain comorbidities such as nasal polyposis [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ], also indicating that patients with this condition have a better response to the drug [ 66 ].…”
Section: T2 Targeted Therapies In Asthmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, a comparative analysis of the efficacy of reported biologicals for CRSwNP based on the published data for phase 2 and 3 studies was published [81]. A direct comparison of the efficacy between dupilumab, mepolizumab [82], and omalizumab is challenging, given differences in inclusion criteria, outcome parameters, and time-points of analysis. However, consistent and major reduction of patient relevant and irrelevant outcome parameters are found in all studies with biologicals for CRSwNP, with most available data on dupilumab.…”
Section: Dupilumab Compared To Other Biologicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%