Technology as a Tool for Diversity Leadership
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2668-3.ch019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mentorship in Diversity Leadership in Higher Education

Abstract: The purpose of this chapter is to 1) review the need for diversity leadership in higher education, 2) explore the challenges of diversity leaders, 3) specify the need for mentorship in diversity leadership, 4) share the authors’ successful e-mentoring experiences as women faculty of color engaged in diversity leadership, and 5) offer recommendations on how to incorporate technology as a tool for mentorship in diversity leadership in higher education. The term “diversity” can be considered as vast as it is vagu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We anchor this study in Thomas’s (2018, 2020) conceptualization of diversity regimes, which underscores how institutions stage a benign commitment to diversity. Specifically, diversity statements represent an institution’s attempt to “publicize a commitment to fostering diversity in higher education” (Packer-Williams & Evans, 2013, p. 244). CDA served as an appropriate tool given its focus on identifying how “social power abuse, dominance, and inequity are enacted, reproduced, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context” (Van Dijk, 2003, p. 352).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We anchor this study in Thomas’s (2018, 2020) conceptualization of diversity regimes, which underscores how institutions stage a benign commitment to diversity. Specifically, diversity statements represent an institution’s attempt to “publicize a commitment to fostering diversity in higher education” (Packer-Williams & Evans, 2013, p. 244). CDA served as an appropriate tool given its focus on identifying how “social power abuse, dominance, and inequity are enacted, reproduced, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context” (Van Dijk, 2003, p. 352).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%