Mentoring with(in) care: A co-constructed auto-ethnography of mutual learning

Abstract

Summary Research into workplace mentoring is principally focussed on predictors and psychosocial and instrumental outcomes, while there is scarcely any in‐depth research into relational characteristics, outcomes and processes. This article aims to illustrate these relational aspects. It reports a co‐constructed auto‐ethnography of a dyadic mentoring relationship as experienced by mentor and protégé. The co‐constructed narrative illustrates that attentiveness towards each other and a caring attitude, alongside learning‐focussed values, promote a high‐quality mentoring relationship. This relationship is characterised, among other things, by person centredness, care, trust and mutual influence, thereby offering a situation in which mutual learning and growth can occur. Learning develops through and in relation and is enhanced when both planned and unplanned learning takes place. In addition, the narrative makes clear that learning and growth of both those involved are intertwined and interdependent and that mutual learning and growth enrich and strengthen the relationship. It is concluded that the narrative illustrates a number of complex relational processes that are difficult to elucidate in quantitative studies and theoretical constructs. It offers deeper insight into the initiation and improvement of high‐quality mentoring relationships and emphasises the importance of further research into relational processes in mentoring relationships. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Power Imbalance and Employee Silence: The Role of Abusive Leadership, Power Distance Orientation, and Perceived Organisational Politics

“…Second, considering that power imbalance may make employees refrain from speaking up, organisations may want to consider additional interventions such as mentoring programmes and social support groups, especially if the workplace has considerable politics. Mentors or colleagues can then play a more active role in providing psychosocial support and protection to make their mentees or peers feel more safe and comfortable in speaking out (Snoeren, Raaijmakers, Niessen, & Abma, ). Supervisors should also avoid demonstrating political behaviours given the importance of employee voice for organisational success.…”

How can mentoring support women in a male-dominated workplace? A case study of the UK police force

“…However, it is not sufficiently understood in the world of practice how both parties benefit. Studies tend to show the benefits to either mentees (Phinney et al, 2011) or mentors but rarely investigate the benefit for both parties together (Philip and Hendry, 2000;Laiho and Brandt, 2012;Garvey, 2014;Snoeren et al, 2016). This study will investigate the learning for both parties.…”

Myriad potential for mentoring: Understanding the process of transformational change through a gender equality intervention

“…Scholars increasingly pay attention to reciprocity in the mentoring relationship and the effects for mentors (e.g., De Vries, ; Eby, Durley, Evans, & Ragins, ; Ehrich et al, ; Ghosh & Reio, ; Snoeren et al, ). Studies also report positive effects on mentors' job satisfaction, network building, job performance, turnover intent, organizational commitment and career success (Ehrich et al, ; Ghosh & Reio, ).…”

“…Mentoring programmes, and mentoring programmes for women in particular, are popular organizational interventions in different types of organizations (Baugh & Fagenson-Eland, 2007;Ghosh & Reio, 2013;Snoeren, Raaijmakers, Niessen, & Abma, 2016). These programmes aim to facilitate women in building formal mentoring relationships with senior mentors, regularly complemented with workshops and peer group mentoring, in order to provide them with access to relevant knowledge, networks and information to advance their careers (Baugh & Fagenson-Eland, 2007;Ibarra, Carter, & Silva, 2010;Ragins, 1997;Ragins & Cotton, 1999;Van den Brink & Stobbe, 2014).…”