2011
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007381.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mentoring adolescents to prevent drug and alcohol use

Abstract: All four RCTs were in the US, and included "deprived" and mostly minority adolescents. Participants were young (in two studies age 12, and in two others 9-16). All students at baseline were non-users of alcohol and drugs. Two RCTs found mentoring reduced the rate of initiation of alcohol, and one of drug usage. The ability of the interventions to be effective was limited by the low rates of commencing alcohol and drug use during the intervention period in two studies (the use of marijuana in one study increase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We report findings from three systematic reviews evaluating individual-targeted interventions for substance abuse among adolescents; these included mentoring [71] , counseling, or psychotherapy [72] , [73] . Review evaluating mentoring suggested limited evidence to conclude that the intervention was effective [71] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We report findings from three systematic reviews evaluating individual-targeted interventions for substance abuse among adolescents; these included mentoring [71] , counseling, or psychotherapy [72] , [73] . Review evaluating mentoring suggested limited evidence to conclude that the intervention was effective [71] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report findings from three systematic reviews evaluating individual-targeted interventions for substance abuse among adolescents; these included mentoring [71] , counseling, or psychotherapy [72] , [73] . Review evaluating mentoring suggested limited evidence to conclude that the intervention was effective [71] . The review evaluating counseling and psychotherapy to treat alcohol and other drug use problems in school-aged youth suggested that the effects of counseling and psychotherapy for drug abuse are consistently significant at termination, but follow-up effects yielded inconsistent results [72] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence‐based practice in the field of prevention of substance misuse appeared even more challenging. Although several Cochrane reviews are available that evaluated effects of prevention interventions, conclusions are rather general, providing few indications on the effective elements of prevention programs (Gates et al., ; Thomas et al., ; Faggiano et al., ; Foxcroft & Tsertsvadze, ,b,c). This hampers the process of making recommendations on effective prevention practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of systematic reviews have been undertaken to scrutinise the available evidence on mentoring with regard to a range of different outcomes including academic, health, relational, and social outcomes of young people. Whereas only some reviews focussed solely on randomised control trial evaluations ( Thomas, Lorenzetti, & Spragins, 2011 ; Thomas, Lorenzetti, & Spragins, 2013a ; Thomas, Lorenzetti, & Spragins, 2013b ), others included a variety of study designs. The majority of reviews were based on programmes in the United States of America (USA) where most studies have been undertaken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, no statistically significant effects was found in the health domain in DuBois's systematic review ( DuBois et al, 2011 ) nor was any effect of mentoring observed on academic attitude, achievement and attendance in Randolph's review of school-based programmes ( Randolph & Johnson, 2008 ). Meta-analyses have reported no statistical significant effect of mentoring on young people's evaluation of psychological stress and strain ( Eby et al, 2008 ), motivation or involvement ( Eby et al, 2008 ), helping others ( Eby et al, 2008 ), measures of aggression ( Tolan et al, 2013 ), smoking ( Thomas et al, 2013b ) and there have been mixed findings with regard to young person's drug use or alcohol use ( Thomas et al, 2011 ; Thomas et al, 2013a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%