2020 Fifth International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icrcicn50933.2020.9296150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental Workload Estimation Using EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Jiao et al [ 242 ] have designed a novel CNN architecture with an average result accuracy of 90% in 15 participants. In reference [ 247 ], the MWL has been classified by using the KNN classifier, the LSTM classifier, and the CNN + LSTM network. The best performance (61.08%) was achieved for the LSTM classifier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Jiao et al [ 242 ] have designed a novel CNN architecture with an average result accuracy of 90% in 15 participants. In reference [ 247 ], the MWL has been classified by using the KNN classifier, the LSTM classifier, and the CNN + LSTM network. The best performance (61.08%) was achieved for the LSTM classifier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, as shown in Table 3, almost all of the previous methods do not apply to estimating the MWL of workers. In the dual-task estimation, the method proposed by Pandey et al (2020) was only marginally more accurate than random. In contrast, our method was able to achieve 82.78%, which is sufficient for use in realistic scenarios.…”
Section: Estimation Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is worth noting that no studies were conducted with either dualtask estimation (No Task vs. Task) or triple task estimation (Lo vs. Mi vs. Hi) subject-independent experiments simultaneously until now (Lim et al, 2018;Pandey et al, 2020).…”
Section: Subject-independent Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mental workload recognition from EEG signal using deep learning techniques was conducted in [16] and it achieved only 65% classification accuracy. Mental workload estimation using EEG was also introduced by Vishal Pandey et al in 2020 in an international conference with maximum 72% classification accuracy [17]. Cognitive Workload assessment on simultaneous tasks was proposed by Wonse Jo et al in 2022 with 74.68% [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%