1993
DOI: 10.1159/000472389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental Status and Fragile X Expression in Relation to FMR-1 Gene Mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rearrangements associated with triplet repeats have been noted previously for E. coli (24,25,57) and in patients with fragile X syndrome (13,15,45,47,69). The characterized fragile X rearrangements include deletions that encompass the CGG repeat (13,69) and deletions that have one end within the repeat (45,47), which are similar to the types of rearrangements that we have identified for CTG repeats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Rearrangements associated with triplet repeats have been noted previously for E. coli (24,25,57) and in patients with fragile X syndrome (13,15,45,47,69). The characterized fragile X rearrangements include deletions that encompass the CGG repeat (13,69) and deletions that have one end within the repeat (45,47), which are similar to the types of rearrangements that we have identified for CTG repeats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Patient 1 has a Prader-Willi like phenotype and was previously described by de Vries et ai (46). The three other patients have the classical M artin-B ell phenotype.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is consistent with the recent report in which it was found that the degree of mental retardation in most prepubertal fragile X males is moderate, and in adults it is moderate to severe. [32][33] A correlation between macro-orchidism and fragile X syndrome has also been reported, however, macroorchidism is generally difficult to identify early in life and is frequently absent in younger patients. [1][2] However, different frequencies of fragile X-positive cases were reported among patients with macro-orchidism as one of the clinical features; this figure ranges from 11% to 80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%