Mental Simulation of Painful Situations Has an Impact on Posture and Psychophysiological Parameters

Abstract

Embodiment is made possible by the ability to imagine ourselves in a particular situation (mental simulation). Postural changes have been demonstrated in response to painful situations, but the effect of an implicit instruction has not been studied. The present study was designed to record differential responses according to whether or not subjects were instructed to imagine themselves in a painful or non-painful situation. Painful stimuli and instructions to mentally simulate the displayed situation were hypothesized to induce postural changes that could be demonstrated by changes in the center of pressure (COP) trajectory compared to viewing the same stimuli with no instructions. We hypothesized that mental simulation of a painful situation would induce embodiment of the emotional situation as reflected by posterior displacement of the COP and physiological responses as compared to passive observation of the same visual scene. Thirty-one subjects participated in this study while standing quietly on a posturographic platform with presentation of visual stimuli depicting scenes defining three experimental conditions (painful, non-painful and neutral situations) for 12 s. Physiological measurements [heart rate (HR) and electrodermal activity] and postural responses (COP displacements) were recorded in response to the stimuli with or without instructions to imagine themselves in the situation. Time-course analyses (1 s sliding window) were conducted for several postural parameters, HR and electrodermal response. An interaction effect (instruction × stimuli × time) demonstrated that mental simulation induced posterior displacement of the mean position of the COP at different times during presentation of visual stimuli (4 s; 9–12 s). An effect of instruction was reported for HR (HR was higher in the mental simulation condition), while a stimulation effect was reported only for HR (lower for painful stimuli than for non-painful stimuli). The results of time-course analyses demonstrated embodiment of painful situations by postural control modulations and physiological changes depending on whether or not the participants were instructed to imagine themselves in the situation.

Evoked pleasure and approach-avoidance in response to pollution

“…Therefore, regarding landscapes and the space representation that they involve, it seems reasonable to infer that not only the physical features of a landscape affect its neural and psychological representation, but so do many other mechanisms, such as emotional processes (through, for example, the emotional/agreeable valence attributed to a landscape). Several previous studies have demonstrated the influence of emotional information on motor reactions [such as in posturography; 5,6,7,8].…”

“…In this framework, this study questions the interrelation between the motor and affective components of behavior [5]. We have explored this issue in the introductions of several of our studies [5,6,7,8], and it has been studied elsewhere. For example, Darwin proposed that emotion adapts behavior to the context [9].…”

Pain between Psyche and Soma in Uro-Andrology

“…Further and recent studies have investigated autonomic reactions more widely following the presentation of stimuli with emotional content [48][49][50].…”

The future of TTOM

“…A second study (Lelard et al 2017) was designed to record the differential postural correlates of empathy for pain according to whether or not participants were instructed to imagine themselves in a painful or non-painful situation. Both painful visual scenes (as in the preceding study) and instructions to embody the displayed situation were hypothesized to induce postural postural and physiological changes.…”