2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental rotation performance in primary school age children: Are there gender differences in chronometric tests?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous mental-rotation research, only the responses for "same" tasks were analyzed (compare Jansen et al 2013). Furthermore, reaction times and accuracy rates for 45°, 90°, 135°and 225°, 270°, 335°were collapsed pairwise for the clockwise and counterclockwise angles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In line with previous mental-rotation research, only the responses for "same" tasks were analyzed (compare Jansen et al 2013). Furthermore, reaction times and accuracy rates for 45°, 90°, 135°and 225°, 270°, 335°were collapsed pairwise for the clockwise and counterclockwise angles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Does manual dexterity influence this mental-rotation performance of action-based items? Due to the study of Jansen et al (2013) and Ruthsatz et al (2013) we expected a gender differences favoring boys, which might be reduced with female stereotyped items. According to previous studies showing an influence of manual-rotation training (Wiedenbauer and Jansen-Osmann 2008) and an interference between a manual and mental rotation in primary-school-aged children (Frick et al 2009), we expected an influence of manual dexterity on mental-rotation performance.…”
Section: Goal and Hypotheses Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies tested children's performance on various 2-D stimuli using animal drawings or other familiar objects, alphanumeric stimuli, or abstract characters, and showed that various 2-D stimuli differ in their difficulty level. Performances for familiar 2-D stimuli (e.g., animal drawings or alphanumeric stimuli) were found to elicit higher accuracy scores and shorter response time as opposed to abstract characters [56][57][58][59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%