Mental health problems and needs of frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: A qualitative analysis

Abstract

BackgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) from COVID-19 hotspots worldwide have reported poor mental health outcomes since the pandemic's beginning. The virulence of the initial COVID-19 surge in Spain and the urgency for rapid evidence constrained early studies in their capacity to inform mental health programs accurately. Here, we used a qualitative research design to describe relevant mental health problems among frontline HCWs and explore their association with determinants and consequences and their implications for the design and implementation of mental health programs.Materials and methodsFollowing the Programme Design, Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation (DIME) protocol, we used a two-step qualitative research design to interview frontline HCWs, mental health experts, administrators, and service planners in Spain. We used Free List (FL) interviews to identify problems experienced by frontline HCWs and Key informant (KI) interviews to describe them and explore their determinants and consequences, as well as the strategies considered useful to overcome these problems. We used a thematic analysis approach to analyze the interview outputs and framed our results into a five-level social-ecological model (intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public health).ResultsWe recruited 75 FL and 22 KI interviewees, roughly balanced in age and gender. We detected 56 themes during the FL interviews and explored the following themes in the KI interviews: fear of infection, psychological distress, stress, moral distress, and interpersonal conflicts among coworkers. We found that interviewees reported perceived causes and consequences across problems at all levels (intrapersonal to public health). Although several mental health strategies were implemented (especially at an intrapersonal and interpersonal level), most mental health needs remained unmet, especially at the organizational, community, and public policy levels.ConclusionsIn keeping with available quantitative evidence, our findings show that mental health problems are still relevant for frontline HCWs 1 year after the COVID-19 pandemic and that many reported causes of these problems are modifiable. Based on this, we offer specific recommendations to design and implement mental health strategies and recommend using transdiagnostic, low-intensity, scalable psychological interventions contextually adapted and tailored for HCWs.

Are we ready for the next pandemic? Lessons learned from healthcare professionals’ perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Qualitative studies conducted around the world support the current findings, with psychosocial issues such as isolation and social stigma, depression, stress and burnout at the forefront (35,(47)(48)(49)(50). The new and changing working environment and its impact on HCPs during this pandemic was also reported.…”

“…An online mindfulness intervention used by HCPs in Kuwait during the pandemic demonstrated improved mental health outcomes ( 30 ). Peer support and mindfulness interventions were also suggested by HCPs in Spain during the pandemic ( 50 ). Cognitive-based therapy, whether as individuals or groups, has also been shown to reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression in HCPs who have faced crises ( 62 ).…”

Effectiveness of a stepped-care programme of WHO psychological interventions in migrant populations resettled in Italy: Study protocol for the RESPOND randomized controlled trial

“…The results of this randomized trial will be considered together with the results of three other trials that are being conducted using the same study design, but focussing on different vulnerable groups, as part of the RESPOND programme. While the present study has a focus on migrants including refugees and asylum seekers resettled in Italy, health-care workers is the target population of a study conducted in Spain (56), people living in social adversity conditions are being recruited in France, and in the Netherlands labor migrants are the target population. Taken together, these studies will quantify the beneficial effects of stepped-care psychological interventions in a wide range of populations exposed to COVID-19 related psychological distress or other types of stressors, and will make available DWM/PM+ packages adapted for remote delivery following a task-shifting approach.…”

Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among frontline healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Most opinions show that psychological strategies are the mediating factor to change these outstanding problems, although the stressors (COVID-19 pandemic) cannot be changed (Mediavilla et al, 2022). Importantly, increasing the so-called social support barriers (i.e., factors that increase the use of social support, even when available) might also contribute to improving the mental health of HCWs (Thoresen et al, 2014).…”