Mental health nurses and qualitative research methods: a mutual attraction?

Abstract

Mental health nurses and qualitative research methods: a mutual attraction? In response to issues arising out of curriculum developments, the authors wished to examine more closely the potential reasons why psychiatric/mental health (P/MH) nurses appear to gravitate towards certain research methodologies. This paper therefore briefly examines the essential differences between qualitative and quantitative research paradigms, focusing on philosophical, epistemological and methodological issues. It then proceeds to examine some of the essential characteristics and attributes of P/MH nurses and suggests some differences in emphasis between these and other disciplines of nursing. The authors posit that psychiatric/mental health nurses are drawn to the qualitative paradigm as a result of the potential synchronicity and linkage that appears to exist between the practice of mental health nursing and qualitative research. This apparent synchronicity appears to centre around the three themes of: (a) the purposeful use of self; (b) the creation of an interpersonal relationship; and (c) the ability to accept and embrace ambiguity and uncertainty. Given this alleged synchronicity the authors argue that there are implications for nurse education and nursing research. Further it is possible that each nursing situation where the mental health nurse forms a relationship and attempts to gain an empathic sense of the individual's world is akin to an informal phenomenological study, the product of which would be a wealth of qualitative data. However, as this would be a subconscious, implicit process, the data would remain predominantly unprocessed. The authors conclude that perhaps these data are the knowledge that expert practitioners draw upon when making intuition-based clinical judgements.

Nurses’ perceptions of mental health assessment in an acute inpatient setting in New Zealand: A qualitative study

“…This is not a static process but variable, fluid and changing over time and place depending on the interactions with each other which is a two‐way process (Cutcliffe 2000). The social reality consists thus of the experiences and understandings of people.…”

Commentary: Expert researchers and audit trails

“…Yet, at the very least, one thing an examination of the history and development of qualitative methods tells us is that the methods are rarely static. Criteria for judging the quality of qualitative research are not 'set in concrete', and huge advances in method and findings have occurred as a result of researchers moving away from established norms and challenging hegemonies (Turner 1981, Cutcliffe & Goward 2000.…”

Reducing Stress in Mental Health Practitioners - Becoming Change Agents in Practice Through Action Research

“…The role of psychiatric nurses is significantly different to that of their equally qualified and skilled counterparts in other specialty areas of nursing. Cutcliffe and Goward (2000) contend that psychiatric nurses have a relationship with their clients that are qualitatively different to their counterparts in other disciplines. In psychiatric nursing, the role is based on the development of a mutually influenced relationship between the mental health consumer and the nurse.…”