Abstract:This study suggests that psychological morbidity was common in Iranian medical students and practitioners, particularly women. Women were at particular risk. A high prevalence of emotional disturbance among health care practitioners is likely to compound existing problems of health care provision.
“…This is consistent with the findings of Jafari et al; (15) but Sherina et al found no association between the years of study in medical school and mental health (7) neither Assadi et al found any significant difference between undergraduate students, interns and postgraduates. (18) Although mean GHQ scores were not significantly different in three groups of socioeconomic status, the participants with lowest economic position had higher scores. Assadi et al also reported this; (18) similarly, being from a non-poor family was considered as a factor helping better mental health status by Yang et al (23) However, socioeconomic status in our study was self-reported and only measured by family monthly income, which might not present the exact socioeconomic position of the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(18) Although mean GHQ scores were not significantly different in three groups of socioeconomic status, the participants with lowest economic position had higher scores. Assadi et al also reported this; (18) similarly, being from a non-poor family was considered as a factor helping better mental health status by Yang et al (23) However, socioeconomic status in our study was self-reported and only measured by family monthly income, which might not present the exact socioeconomic position of the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(21,22) We found higher percentage of abnormal mental health status among our participants in comparison to a study conducted in Tehran University of Medical Sciences, which was 43.9%. (18) However, this difference between Shiraz and Tehran medical students' mental health status cannot be due to the difference between universities' educational curriculums; as medical educational programs are quite consistent in all the universities of Iran. Living conditions of the students are private homes or university dormitories in both cities, which may be different individually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think the main reason for this difference is entering graduated students and interns to the above study; but our participants were undergraduate students. (18) The higher mean scores of anxiety and especially depression rather than somatic and social subscales found in our medical students agrees with high proportion of these morbidities measured by their specific tools in United States and Canadian medical students, reported in the systematic review by Dyrbye et al (1) Although, there were no significant differences between genders, the prevalence of mental morbidity was higher in males in our study; and this is not similar to other studies' findings, which reported higher mental problems among females. (1,7,15,18) Third and fourth year medical students had higher proportions of abnormal mental health status with higher mean scores of all subscales; compared with second and first year students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17) Previous studies have assessed the reliability and validity of Persian form of the GHQ-28 and were of acceptable ranges from 0.73 to 0.89. (18)(19)(20) Through factor analysis, the GHQ-28 has been divided into four subscales, which are somatic symptoms (items 1-7); anxiety/insomnia (items [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]; social dysfunction (items [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and depression (items 22-28).…”
Abstract:Objectives: More mental morbidities were reported in medical students than their nonmedical peers, which may negatively influence their lives and future career. The aim of this study was to assess the mental health status among medical students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
Method:Two hundred and eight 1 st to 4 th year Medical students took part in this cross-sectional study. General Health Questionnaire with 28 items (GHQ-28) was used for data collection. We performed descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney U test, one way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc and Kruskal Wallis H and Chi square test for statistical analysis.
Results:The mean age of participants was 20.70 ± 1.14 (mean ± SD) years. More than half of them (54.4%) had total GHQ score above the cut-off point considered as probably abnormal mental health status. Years of education, positive family history and low satisfaction of the medicine discipline affected their mental health. Third and fourth year students had significantly higher mean scores of total GHQ (p-value = 0.009) and anxiety, somatic and social subscales (p-value = 0.001, 0.004 and 0.026). Students with positive family history of mental illness and low satisfaction of field of the study significantly had higher GHQ scores (p-value = 0.012 and < 0.001 respectively).
Conclusion:Poor mental health prevalence is high among medical students in Shiraz. Proper changes in educational programs and other effective interventions to raise the students' satisfaction may reduce the effect of other stress reasons and improve their mental health status.
“…This is consistent with the findings of Jafari et al; (15) but Sherina et al found no association between the years of study in medical school and mental health (7) neither Assadi et al found any significant difference between undergraduate students, interns and postgraduates. (18) Although mean GHQ scores were not significantly different in three groups of socioeconomic status, the participants with lowest economic position had higher scores. Assadi et al also reported this; (18) similarly, being from a non-poor family was considered as a factor helping better mental health status by Yang et al (23) However, socioeconomic status in our study was self-reported and only measured by family monthly income, which might not present the exact socioeconomic position of the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(18) Although mean GHQ scores were not significantly different in three groups of socioeconomic status, the participants with lowest economic position had higher scores. Assadi et al also reported this; (18) similarly, being from a non-poor family was considered as a factor helping better mental health status by Yang et al (23) However, socioeconomic status in our study was self-reported and only measured by family monthly income, which might not present the exact socioeconomic position of the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(21,22) We found higher percentage of abnormal mental health status among our participants in comparison to a study conducted in Tehran University of Medical Sciences, which was 43.9%. (18) However, this difference between Shiraz and Tehran medical students' mental health status cannot be due to the difference between universities' educational curriculums; as medical educational programs are quite consistent in all the universities of Iran. Living conditions of the students are private homes or university dormitories in both cities, which may be different individually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think the main reason for this difference is entering graduated students and interns to the above study; but our participants were undergraduate students. (18) The higher mean scores of anxiety and especially depression rather than somatic and social subscales found in our medical students agrees with high proportion of these morbidities measured by their specific tools in United States and Canadian medical students, reported in the systematic review by Dyrbye et al (1) Although, there were no significant differences between genders, the prevalence of mental morbidity was higher in males in our study; and this is not similar to other studies' findings, which reported higher mental problems among females. (1,7,15,18) Third and fourth year medical students had higher proportions of abnormal mental health status with higher mean scores of all subscales; compared with second and first year students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17) Previous studies have assessed the reliability and validity of Persian form of the GHQ-28 and were of acceptable ranges from 0.73 to 0.89. (18)(19)(20) Through factor analysis, the GHQ-28 has been divided into four subscales, which are somatic symptoms (items 1-7); anxiety/insomnia (items [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]; social dysfunction (items [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and depression (items 22-28).…”
Abstract:Objectives: More mental morbidities were reported in medical students than their nonmedical peers, which may negatively influence their lives and future career. The aim of this study was to assess the mental health status among medical students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
Method:Two hundred and eight 1 st to 4 th year Medical students took part in this cross-sectional study. General Health Questionnaire with 28 items (GHQ-28) was used for data collection. We performed descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney U test, one way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc and Kruskal Wallis H and Chi square test for statistical analysis.
Results:The mean age of participants was 20.70 ± 1.14 (mean ± SD) years. More than half of them (54.4%) had total GHQ score above the cut-off point considered as probably abnormal mental health status. Years of education, positive family history and low satisfaction of the medicine discipline affected their mental health. Third and fourth year students had significantly higher mean scores of total GHQ (p-value = 0.009) and anxiety, somatic and social subscales (p-value = 0.001, 0.004 and 0.026). Students with positive family history of mental illness and low satisfaction of field of the study significantly had higher GHQ scores (p-value = 0.012 and < 0.001 respectively).
Conclusion:Poor mental health prevalence is high among medical students in Shiraz. Proper changes in educational programs and other effective interventions to raise the students' satisfaction may reduce the effect of other stress reasons and improve their mental health status.
Poor mental health in doctors appears to be a global phenomenon, but there are limited data on changes in doctors' psychological symptoms over time in mainland China. Through a detailed meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies, our aim was to examine the prevalence of psychological symptoms in Chinese physicians as measured with the Symptom Checklist 90-R (SCL-90-R) and to explore the factors associated with doctors' mental health. A comprehensive search was performed in major English and Chinese databases. Thirty studies involving a total of 6,099 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates of psychological symptoms including somatization, obsession-compulsion, interpersonal-sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, and paranoid ideation among doctors were significantly higher than those in the general population. Only psychoticism was similar in prevalence to Chinese population norms. The prevalence increased with the study year but decreased with physicians' increasing age. Doctors from central and western China experienced more mental health symptoms than those from eastern China. Psychiatrists scored significantly less favorably than other doctors on most subscales of the SCL-90-R. Doctors' mental health may be associated with age discrepancy, quantitative workload, effort-reward ratio, doctor-patient relationships, professional identity, and individual traits. To minimize the risk of poor mental health in doctors, screening and professional intervention services should be provided at early career stages to raise physicians' awareness about the importance of maintaining psychological well-being and to reduce the prevalence of psychological symptoms.
Psychological distress was significantly greater in our sample of Hungarian medical students than in the same age group of the general population. Psychological distress is strongly related to SOC and can be estimated by our proposed models. Both SOC and psychological distress can be used to characterize the mental health of future medical doctors, the improvement of which needs attention even during their training.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.