Mental health consequences of COVID-19 pandemic on adult population: a systematic review

Abstract

Purpose The spread of novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has infected millions of people worldwide. Public health emergencies caused by COVID-19 affect not only people’s physical health but also mental health. This paper aims to summarize recent research findings on the mental health impact of COVID-19 experienced by the general adult population. Design/methodology/approach This paper used a systematic approach and aimed to review the literature on mental health problems faced by general adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. The PubMed database has been selected randomly from the Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed databases. Ten journal articles published between January and July 2020 were selected from the PubMed database for the final review. Findings There is growing evidence that COVID-19 may be an objective risk factor for mental distress among the general adult population. More psychological and social support should be provided to protect adult people’s mental health. Practical implications This review will help policymakers develop mental health interventions for the general adult population vulnerable to psychological distress because of COVID-19 pandemic. Originality/value This paper is original and contributes to the existing knowledge that the mental health challenges of COVID-19 are widespread. There is, therefore, a need for more psychological interventions for adults, older adults, in particular, to promote mental health and reduce the distress associated with public health emergencies caused by COVID-19.

Associations between emotion regulation and remission following cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with bulimia nervosa

“…Second, there is a chance that individuals' ER abilities suffered as a result of the pandemic and the social, emotional, and environmental disruptions that occurred during the time this study was completed. While we did not observe any differences in baseline ER between those who started treatment pre-pandemic and those who started treatment once the pandemic began, research has shown significant deleterious impacts of the pandemic on mental health, including an increase in depression and anxiety, general burnout, and eating pathology (Raihan, 2020); it is possible that worse overall mental health could have also impacted outcomes despite there not being significant differences.…”

“…The DERS does not have specified clinical cut‐offs or severity markers. Given the negative impact of COVID‐19 on mental health broadly (Raihan, 2020), it is possible that ER abilities decreased on a population level. As such, we tested differences between baseline DERS scores of those recruited before and during the pandemic and found them to not be statistically different (range of t scores = −3.51–1.67, range of p values 0.10−0.94.…”

Understanding cultural factors in mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: when collectivism meets a tight culture

“…As a global calamity, the COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented opportunities for investigating the impact of culture on epidemics, posing challenges for people all over the world (Boyraz et al, 2020). Previous studies have reported that the number of people suffering from mental health issues, such as depression and anxiety (Raihan, 2021;Salari et al, 2020), is gradually increasing, with a growing number of cases. This study found that mental health issues may result from one's perceived risk of COVID-19, consistent with the conclusions of previous studies (Hyland et al, 2020).…”

Rhaponticum uniflorum and Serratula centauroides Extracts Attenuate Emotional Injury in Acute and Chronic Emotional Stress

“…In recent decades, their use has taken on particular significance due to the widespread of neurosis-like and neurotic states in practically healthy persons caused by neuroendocrine-immune system imbalance [2,3]. In the COVID-19 pandemic conditions, borderline psycho-emotional disorders resulting in the development of stressinduced pathological states and negative disease outcomes were registered in 60-70% of the adult population around the world [4,5].…”