2020
DOI: 10.5334/joc.126
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental Fatigue Might Be Not So Bad for Exercise Performance After All: A Systematic Review and Bias-Sensitive Meta-Analysis

Abstract: There is an ongoing debate in the scientific community regarding whether a state of mental fatigue may have a negative effect upon a range of objective and subjective measures of human performance. This issue has attracted attention from several fields, including sport and exercise sciences. In fact, a considerable body of literature in the sport science field has suggested that performing a long and demanding cognitive task might lead to a state of mental fatigue, impairing subsequent exercise performance, al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(92 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the magnitude of performance impairment is not robustly linked to the duration of the prior self-control task (Giboin and Wolff, 2019), which conflicts with the theoretical proposition that the magnitude of the performance decrement should scale linearly with the duration of the prior self-control task (Hagger et al, 2010a). In addition, a recent bias-sensitive meta-analysis of the literature suggests that initial estimates of the effects of prior self-control on subsequent sports performance might be smaller than initially assumed (Holgado et al, 2020). This inconsistent body of literature limits our understanding of the relationship between self-control and sports performance.…”
Section: Self-control In Sports and Exercisementioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, the magnitude of performance impairment is not robustly linked to the duration of the prior self-control task (Giboin and Wolff, 2019), which conflicts with the theoretical proposition that the magnitude of the performance decrement should scale linearly with the duration of the prior self-control task (Hagger et al, 2010a). In addition, a recent bias-sensitive meta-analysis of the literature suggests that initial estimates of the effects of prior self-control on subsequent sports performance might be smaller than initially assumed (Holgado et al, 2020). This inconsistent body of literature limits our understanding of the relationship between self-control and sports performance.…”
Section: Self-control In Sports and Exercisementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Moreover, a qualitative analysis of the changes was performed: 0.5% to 5%, very unlikely; 5% to 25%, unlikely; 25% to 75%, possibly; 75% to 95%, likely; 95% to 99.5%, very likely; and > 99.5%, most likely [ 42 ]. The use of these two types of statistical analysis ( p -values and MBI) is based on Holgado et al’s affirmation according to previously reported data about the statistical negative effects of mental fatigue on physical performance or the fatigue that could have been caused by statistical errors [ 43 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a recent meta-analysis questioned the magnitude of the detrimental effect of prior mental prior mental exertion (mental fatigue) on subsequent physical performance (Holgado, Sanabria, Perales, & Vadillo, 2020). However, it is important to note that this effect size is likely to hinge on the specific nature of the subsequent physical performance.…”
Section: Prior Mental Exertion Does Not Impact All Types Of Physical Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%