2017
DOI: 10.1177/0957155817693496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental distress under Occupation: The journal of Madeleine Blaess

Abstract: Madeleine Blaess a British doctoral student studying at the Sorbonne was trapped in Paris unable to return home to York for the duration of the Occupation. In October 1940 she began a diary which she kept diligently until September 1944. This unique testimony written from the perspective of a British student at liberty to roam wartime Paris, focuses more on the civilian struggle through the everyday than on the political and military situation which Blaess, vulnerable to arrest, thinks wise to mention as littl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a relatively large body of work that engages first-person narrative as a strategy to preserve and explore self-identity when illness threatens to fragment it (Church, 1995;McDonnell, 2018;Michallat, 2017;Stone, 2006). Existing first person narratives of madness confront its triggers and symptoms in ways that look to rebuild, strengthen, and reinstate self-identity in the face of its disintegration (Bassman, 2007;Burstow & Weitz, 1988;Pembroke, 2009;Romme et al, 2009;Russo & Sweeney, 2016;Shannonhouse, 2003).…”
Section: Chapter Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a relatively large body of work that engages first-person narrative as a strategy to preserve and explore self-identity when illness threatens to fragment it (Church, 1995;McDonnell, 2018;Michallat, 2017;Stone, 2006). Existing first person narratives of madness confront its triggers and symptoms in ways that look to rebuild, strengthen, and reinstate self-identity in the face of its disintegration (Bassman, 2007;Burstow & Weitz, 1988;Pembroke, 2009;Romme et al, 2009;Russo & Sweeney, 2016;Shannonhouse, 2003).…”
Section: Chapter Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%