2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental and physical skill training increases neurogenesis via cell survival in the adolescent hippocampus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been argued that since physical exercise changes the brain in profound ways, this may “prime” the brain for benefits of cognitive training, 40 , 41 and there is some evidence in animal models to support this. 42 , 43 Alternatively, some have begun to partially test the reverse model in which mental exercise precedes physical activity, and again there is some supportive evidence in animal models, 44 as well as a feasibility trial to evaluate this in humans. 45 We propose that interactive exercise over time, in humans, may maximize these underlying neurobiological mechanisms and processes promoting both neurogenesis and cell survival via physical and cognitive exercise, but in a maximized way given the constant feedback provided by a naturalistic form of interactive exercise that taps into evolutionarily adaptive survival (eg, locomoting through an environment and accomplishing tasks, akin to foraging and staying alert to cognitive cues that might promote survival such as noticing a food source or detecting a predator 43 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that since physical exercise changes the brain in profound ways, this may “prime” the brain for benefits of cognitive training, 40 , 41 and there is some evidence in animal models to support this. 42 , 43 Alternatively, some have begun to partially test the reverse model in which mental exercise precedes physical activity, and again there is some supportive evidence in animal models, 44 as well as a feasibility trial to evaluate this in humans. 45 We propose that interactive exercise over time, in humans, may maximize these underlying neurobiological mechanisms and processes promoting both neurogenesis and cell survival via physical and cognitive exercise, but in a maximized way given the constant feedback provided by a naturalistic form of interactive exercise that taps into evolutionarily adaptive survival (eg, locomoting through an environment and accomplishing tasks, akin to foraging and staying alert to cognitive cues that might promote survival such as noticing a food source or detecting a predator 43 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exercise has also been shown to rescue alcohol‐induced deficits in cell proliferation in adolescent rats (Helfer, Goodlett, Greenough, & Klintsova, ). Interestingly, a physical skills training task has recently been reported to increase cell survival in the DG of adolescent rats (DiFeo & Shors, ). However, training on this type of tasks involves physical exercise and learning, both of which increase neurogenesis and so a definitive conclusion on the effects of exercise alone during adolescence on hippocampal neurogenesis cannot be determined from this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acronym MAP stands for “mental and physical training.” It combines mental training through focused‐attention (FA) meditation with physical training through aerobic exercise. The intervention itself was translated from neuroscientific studies (Curlik and Shors, ; DiFeo and Shors, ), which indicate that aerobic exercise increases the production of new neurons in the adult hippocampus (Nokia et al, ; van Praag et al, ), whereas effortful learning processes increase their survival (Curlik et al, ; Shors et al, ). The neurogenesis studies were conducted in laboratory animal models, and because it is not possible to measure neurogenesis in humans, we only claim here that the intervention was “inspired” by laboratory studies, not that it is possible to assess any influence on neurogenesis itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%