1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)90325-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Menstrual Loss After Tubal Ligation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McCann and Kessel [8] reported no change in menstrual patterns after laparoscopic sterilization in a large study group. Similarly some others reported that tubal occlusion did not influence menstrual loss [7,10,11]. Ringrose [2] concluded that fimbriectomy may be the best surgical procedure to diminish the present unsatisfactory incidence of postligation pain and menorrhagia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…McCann and Kessel [8] reported no change in menstrual patterns after laparoscopic sterilization in a large study group. Similarly some others reported that tubal occlusion did not influence menstrual loss [7,10,11]. Ringrose [2] concluded that fimbriectomy may be the best surgical procedure to diminish the present unsatisfactory incidence of postligation pain and menorrhagia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lu and Chun [42] proposed a mechanism for increased menstrual loss following tubal ligation. However, Alderman [43] conducted a prospective trial of patients undergoing Pomeroy-type tubal ligation and failed to show any increase in menstrual loss. It has been proposed that this is more likely with tubal division than with occlusion by clips or rings, and that this is the explanation for improved results with laparoscopic methods.…”
Section: Female Sterilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%