1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)90016-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meningococcal Infections in Bolton, 1971-74

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar (but non-significant) trend was observed in our study. Munford and others have proposed that meningococci are usually introduced into the household by adult members, spreading secondarily to susceptible children and infants [14,23]. The lower likelihood of isolating indistinguishable meningococci from household contacts of older cases suggests that these cases may acquire meningococci more frequently from social contacts outside the immediate family.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar (but non-significant) trend was observed in our study. Munford and others have proposed that meningococci are usually introduced into the household by adult members, spreading secondarily to susceptible children and infants [14,23]. The lower likelihood of isolating indistinguishable meningococci from household contacts of older cases suggests that these cases may acquire meningococci more frequently from social contacts outside the immediate family.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1971-4 an outbreak in Bolton, England, was caused by sulphonamide-susceptible group B type 2 strains; this outbreak was characterized by a high attack rate in young children 6-11 months of age [8]. At the same time, 1972-3, group B meningococci predominated in an outbreak in Devon, England, in which about 2/3 of the patients were under 10 years of age [9].…”
Section: The Outbreakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several environmental factors have been associated with susceptibility to meningococcal disease: passive exposure to cigarette smoke [4,5]; overcrowded accommodation [6]; poverty and lower social class [7]; strenuous physical activity [5]; predisposing viral infections [8][9][10]. As the population affected was old enough to have enough smokers for statistical analysis, the effects of smoking or passive exposure to cigarette smoke on carriage of meningococci among students and staff was examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%