2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0214-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mendelian sampling covariability of marker effects and genetic values

Abstract: BackgroundMeasures of the expected genetic variability among full-sibs are of practical relevance, such as in the context of mating decisions. An important application field in animal and plant breeding is the selection and allocation of mates when large or small amounts of genetic variability among offspring are desired, depending on user-specific goals. Estimates of the Mendelian sampling variance can be obtained by simulating gametes from parents with known diplotypes. Knowledge of recombination rates and a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictions of the genetic variance are not only of interest for selection of crosses in plant breeding but have also been studied in animal breeding for mating decisions (Segelke et al 2014;Bonk et al 2016). We concentrated here on improving a single trait in a directional selection approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictions of the genetic variance are not only of interest for selection of crosses in plant breeding but have also been studied in animal breeding for mating decisions (Segelke et al 2014;Bonk et al 2016). We concentrated here on improving a single trait in a directional selection approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the CI was evaluated in simulated genomes with various degrees of linkage disequilibrium (LD) among QTL, none of these metrics explicitly use recombination or linkage phase information. Recently, Bonk et al (2016) developed breeding value models for dairy herds that use linkage map information to identify matings that will produce progeny with large variances of breeding values. The premise of this approach was that a higher Mendelian sampling variance for a given pair of parents would lead to a higher chance to generating outstanding progeny with many desirable alleles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of coding SNP genotypes for additive effects via X j,k ∈ {1, 0, −1}, genotypes can be coded as X j,k ∈ {0, 1, 0} to account for dominance effects. The covariance between dominance effects has been worked out by Bonk et al . (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family-specific, i.e. sire-specific, covariance between SNP k and l of individual j is, according to Bonk et al . (2016) and Wittenburg et al .…”
Section: Supplemental Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%