2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Mendelian randomization’: an approach for exploring causal relations in epidemiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of potential confounders, together with reverse causation, the OLS regression coefficients may be biased 39 . Therefore, the analysis is extended with the IV method, that is, one‐sample MR, in which the GRS for years of education was used as an instrument for educational attainment 25,40 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of potential confounders, together with reverse causation, the OLS regression coefficients may be biased 39 . Therefore, the analysis is extended with the IV method, that is, one‐sample MR, in which the GRS for years of education was used as an instrument for educational attainment 25,40 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association of this instrument with the exposure is not affected by any confounding factors (because the genetic sequence is randomly assigned during conception), and it is associated with the outcome only via its effects on the exposure. (6) MR has been successful in inferring causality for several clinically important traits (7) and for elucidating the complex etiology of common disease. (8) In this study, we used MR on a genome-metabolome-wide scale.…”
Section: Identification Of Metabolites That Are Causally Associated Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method uses genetic instruments to estimate causal effects (Tyrrell et al, 2016;Böckerman et al, 2017;Gupta et al, 2017). The method exploits Mendel's law of independent assortment according to which trait is inherited independently from other traits at conception.…”
Section: Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study examines the relationship between education and BMI using Mendelian randomization, which is based on the random assignment of genotypes at conception (Tyrrell et al, 2016;Gupta et al, 2017;Davey Smith et al, 2017). This randomization by nature enables the use of a genetic score as an instrument for education and to detect a causal relationship between education and BMI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%