2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.01.21254789
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mendelian randomisation identifies alternative splicing of the FAS death receptor as a mediator of severe COVID-19

Abstract: Severe COVID-19 is characterised by immunopathology and epithelial injury. Proteomic studies have identified circulating proteins that are biomarkers of severe COVID-19, but cannot distinguish correlation from causation. To address this, we performed Mendelian randomisation (MR) to identify proteins that mediate severe COVID-19. Using protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) data from the SCALLOP consortium, involving meta-analysis of up to 26,494 individuals, and COVID-19 genome-wide association data from the H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This decision was made to fully take advantage of the direct biological link between cis-pQTL and protein level and to prevent highly pleiotropic trans-pQTL influencing our results by breaking the assumptions underlying MR. A systematic assessment of cis vs trans IVs would require the use of all of the most recent MR methods 69,70 and meaningful results would be lost due to multiple testing. Additionally, we performed sensitivity analysis in line with the procedure set out by Zheng et al 43 , for using pQTL as IVs and showed that our causal effect estimates were consistent across multiple MR methods with varying assumptions (Supplementary Figure 8), therefore increasing confidence in the robustness of our results 68 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This decision was made to fully take advantage of the direct biological link between cis-pQTL and protein level and to prevent highly pleiotropic trans-pQTL influencing our results by breaking the assumptions underlying MR. A systematic assessment of cis vs trans IVs would require the use of all of the most recent MR methods 69,70 and meaningful results would be lost due to multiple testing. Additionally, we performed sensitivity analysis in line with the procedure set out by Zheng et al 43 , for using pQTL as IVs and showed that our causal effect estimates were consistent across multiple MR methods with varying assumptions (Supplementary Figure 8), therefore increasing confidence in the robustness of our results 68 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We restricted our MR analysis to cis IVs only, in contrast to previous studies 7,43,68 . This decision was made to fully take advantage of the direct biological link between cis-pQTL and protein level and to prevent highly pleiotropic trans-pQTL influencing our results by breaking the assumptions underlying MR. A systematic assessment of cis vs trans IVs would require the use of all of the most recent MR methods 69,70 and meaningful results would be lost due to multiple testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher expression of FAS on CD4+ T cells have been shown to correlate with lower cell counts in Covid-19 patients (28). Along the same lines, elevated circulating levels of the soluble form of FAS have recently been suggested to be causally contributing to the severity of Covid-19, and may in turn originate from genetic splice variants (29). Furthermore, apoptosis of T cells in PBMCs induced by FAS was reported to be increased in Covid-19 patients (30), which along with the involvement of TP53 could explain the lymphopenia frequently observed in COVID-19 subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the beginning of the pandemic, MR has played a critical role in providing evidence of modifiable risk factors for COVID-19 2,11,12 . Furthermore, multiple MR studies identified potential therapeutic targets for COVID-19, including OAS1, ABO, IFNAR2, IL-6, ELF5, and FAS [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . Indeed, some MR findings have been validated by randomized controlled trials, demonstrating the utility of MR [19][20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%