1993
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(93)90079-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Men are more inhibited than women by weak prepulses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
101
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
21
101
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In healthy populations, women when tested regardless of where they are in their menstrual cycle show less PPI than men (Swerdlow et al, 1993(Swerdlow et al, , 1999Abel et al, 1998;Kumari et al, 2003Kumari et al, , 2004Aasen et al, 2005) even when possible confounds such as cigarette smoking are controlled for (Swerdlow et al, 1999). The same phenomenon (ie, less PPI in females than males) has been observed in rats (Koch, 1998;Faraday et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In healthy populations, women when tested regardless of where they are in their menstrual cycle show less PPI than men (Swerdlow et al, 1993(Swerdlow et al, , 1999Abel et al, 1998;Kumari et al, 2003Kumari et al, , 2004Aasen et al, 2005) even when possible confounds such as cigarette smoking are controlled for (Swerdlow et al, 1999). The same phenomenon (ie, less PPI in females than males) has been observed in rats (Koch, 1998;Faraday et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The discrepancy between the current study and the study of Meincke et al (2004) regarding sensitization might be explained by the difference in subject population: in the current study, only males were included, whereas in the study of Meincke et al (2004) both males and females were included. As there are numerous reports in literature describing a gender difference in both PPI (Swerdlow et al, 1993Jovanovic et al, 2004;Kumari et al, 2004) and/or prepulse facilitation (Aasen et al, 2005), it is not inconceivable that gender differences might also exist in the processes of habituation and sensitization. Another explanation might be the difference in the intensity level of the background noise, which was slightly higher in the current study (70 dB) than in the study of Meincke et al (2004) (65 dB), which might have reduced the sensitization effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of the findings (e.g., increased sustained anxiety in the non-abstinent smokers) are consistent with hypotheses based on adult samples (Gilbert 1995). Other limitations include the use of only one interval (120 ms) in the PPI study, the lack of counterbalancing of the three experiments in the current study may have led to less sensitivity of the PPI test, the relatively brief withdrawal period, and the lack of control for phase of the menstrual cycle in women in the PPI experiment (Swerdlow et al 1993).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%