2019
DOI: 10.7202/1062101ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory of the Present: Empathy and Identity in Young Adult Fiction

Abstract: Recent studies in cognitive literary criticism have provided scholars of literature with new, stimulating approaches to literary texts and neuroscientists with new insights about human emotions, empathy, and memory through evidence from fiction. What have so far been largely neglected are the implications of cognitive criticism for the study of literature targeting a young audience, whose theory of mind and empathic skills are not yet fully developed. A cognitive approach to children's and young adult literatu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, picture storybooks are studied by literary scholars (e.g., Agosto, 1999; Nikolajeva and Scott, 2013) and interactive storybooks are studied by researchers in media studies (e.g., Adam and Wild, 1997). Nikolajeva (2014a) has discussed the role of aesthetic synergy for image/text, brain laterality and emotional literacy and Mangen (2008) has theorized the role of the digital format in influencing adults’ empathy in reading literary fiction. Due to space restrictions and the complexity of arguments involved in how different modalities relate to authors’ stylistic choices and how these might influence brain activity and emotional responses, the conceptual framework is limited to text-based storybooks and narratives represented in written words .…”
Section: This Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, picture storybooks are studied by literary scholars (e.g., Agosto, 1999; Nikolajeva and Scott, 2013) and interactive storybooks are studied by researchers in media studies (e.g., Adam and Wild, 1997). Nikolajeva (2014a) has discussed the role of aesthetic synergy for image/text, brain laterality and emotional literacy and Mangen (2008) has theorized the role of the digital format in influencing adults’ empathy in reading literary fiction. Due to space restrictions and the complexity of arguments involved in how different modalities relate to authors’ stylistic choices and how these might influence brain activity and emotional responses, the conceptual framework is limited to text-based storybooks and narratives represented in written words .…”
Section: This Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seminal work by Nikolajeva on children’s reading of fiction (Nikolajeva, 2009, 2014a,b) highlights the fictional nature of narratives written for young children. Given that in storybooks, the characters represent people or, in the case of children’s books, sometimes personified animals, their experiences simulate social experiences.…”
Section: Fiction and Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some discussions about narrator voice in the literature appear to suggest that third-person narrated novels have more benefit for readers, particularly in the areas of empathy (Mar and Oatley, 2008), theory of the mind and perspective taking (Nikolajeva, 2014). Based on that, findings from this study are encouraging.…”
Section: Narrator Voicementioning
confidence: 53%
“…Maria Nikolajeva (2014) further analyses the concept of empathy in young adult fiction, basing her study on recent studies in cognitive literary criticism, which have provided scholars of literature with new and stimulating approaches to literary texts, and neuroscientists with new insights about human emotions, empathy, and memory through evidence from fiction. What have so far been largely neglected, Nikolajeva argues, are the implications of cognitive criticism for the study of literature targeting a young audience, whose theory of mind and empathic skills are not yet fully developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%