2010
DOI: 10.2466/pms.110.1.185-194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory Load and Display Polarity in Visual Search Performance and EEG Response

Abstract: Electroencephalogram measures have frequently been shown to be highly sensitive to variations in task conditions; however, research on the effects of memory load on EEG response and Visual Display Terminal (VDT) performance is lacking. Data from 19 college students were analyzed for effects of memory load and polarity on VDT performance. Included also were modulation of the EEG distribution around the cerebrum, the inferred source of operation of working memory and comprehension. Analyses indicated that the ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, visual fatigue may not be assessed adequately using only a single criterion (Saito, 1999). The commonly used visual fatigue evaluation indices include critical-flicker fusion (Lin, Chen, Lu, & Lin, 2008;Chan & Hsu, 2010), near-point accommodation (Yano, Emoto, & Mitsuhashi, 2004;Krupinski & Reiner, 2012), visual-evoked potential (Murata, Araki, Yokoyama, Yamashita, Okumatsu, & Sakou, 1996;Emoto, Niida, & Okana, 2005), eye-fixation-related brain potential (Yagi, Ikoma, & Kikuchi, 2009), eye blink (Philipp, Udo, & Peter, 2003), and subjective rating of visual fatigue (Kuze & Ukai, 2008). Each of these visual fatigue indices has its own unique physiological or psychological basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, visual fatigue may not be assessed adequately using only a single criterion (Saito, 1999). The commonly used visual fatigue evaluation indices include critical-flicker fusion (Lin, Chen, Lu, & Lin, 2008;Chan & Hsu, 2010), near-point accommodation (Yano, Emoto, & Mitsuhashi, 2004;Krupinski & Reiner, 2012), visual-evoked potential (Murata, Araki, Yokoyama, Yamashita, Okumatsu, & Sakou, 1996;Emoto, Niida, & Okana, 2005), eye-fixation-related brain potential (Yagi, Ikoma, & Kikuchi, 2009), eye blink (Philipp, Udo, & Peter, 2003), and subjective rating of visual fatigue (Kuze & Ukai, 2008). Each of these visual fatigue indices has its own unique physiological or psychological basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experiment by Chan and Hsu (2010), participants performed relatively better when 3-and 5-character memory loads were used. Overload of working memory might have occurred when the number of Chinese characters exceeded 9.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The purpose of the experiment by Chan and Hsu (2010) was to investigate whether working memory is reduced in a task using a visual display terminal (VDT). The authors examined behavioral performance and EEG changes associated with memory load in a visual-search task using a VDT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%