2005
DOI: 10.1017/s135561770505085x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory interference in multiple sclerosis

Abstract: To explore verbal memory impairments associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), we compared proactive and retroactive interference effects on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT; Delis et al., 1987) in a sample of 83 community-residing individuals with MS and 80 healthy participants. Individuals with MS demonstrated normal accumulation of proactive interference (PI), but attenuated release from PI relative to healthy individuals. Furthermore, accumulation of retroactive interference (RI) at short-delay fre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(94 reference statements)
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffuse white matter pathology is likely to negatively impact virtually all aspects of cognitive functioning and consistent with this possibility, deficits in executive functioning, speed of information processing, attention, and retrospective memory have been identified (Beatty et al, 1989;Beatty et al, 1993;Griffiths et al, 2005;Henry & Beatty, 2006). However, deficits in memory are among the most consistently reported findings, and in their meta-analytic review of short-term, long-term, and working memory, Thornton and Raz (1997) concluded that MS is associated with significant impairment on all three types of retrospective memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Diffuse white matter pathology is likely to negatively impact virtually all aspects of cognitive functioning and consistent with this possibility, deficits in executive functioning, speed of information processing, attention, and retrospective memory have been identified (Beatty et al, 1989;Beatty et al, 1993;Griffiths et al, 2005;Henry & Beatty, 2006). However, deficits in memory are among the most consistently reported findings, and in their meta-analytic review of short-term, long-term, and working memory, Thornton and Raz (1997) concluded that MS is associated with significant impairment on all three types of retrospective memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…No passado, admitiu-se que a redução de memória era causada por distúrbios de evocação da informação. As pesquisas mais recentes sugerem que o comprometimento da memória emerge de prejuízo nos processos de armazenamento da informação e decodificação (Benedict & Zivadinov, 2006;Diamond, Johnson, Kaufman, & Graves, 2008;Griffiths et al, 2005). Dessa forma, talvez as cinco tentativas de aprendizagem do RAVLT tenham sido insuficientes para os pacientes com EM codificarem a informação e recordarem (Winkelmann et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A interferência pró-ativa foi considerada como sendo aquela que ocorre quando uma nova informação impede a retenção de uma aprendizagem anterior, enquanto que se admitiu por interferência retroativa a redução de retenção de informações previamente aprendidas causada por aprendizagens subseqüentes (Griffiths et al, 2005).…”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified
“…When considering episodic memory abilities, it is usual to dissociate, on the one end, the long-term maintenance of information over the period of a few minutes to a lifetime (storage). On the other hand, the manipulation of information, which may include multiple executive sub-processes such as encoding, retrieval, sensitivity to interference and learning strategy [7][8][9].While executive impairments can be targeted by cognitive intervention, storage deficits are more likely to require prosthetic strategies (agenda or other external help).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most comprehensive studies [7,8,21,[23][24][25][26]28], only Diamond and colleagues [21] and Stegen and colleagues [8] exhaustively reported on raw scores. In a large sample (351 patients), the latter study reported impaired performances for all the described indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%