1999
DOI: 10.3109/01674829909075580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory in pregnancy. I: Subjective experiences and objective assessment of implicit, explicit and working memory in primigravid and primiparous women

Abstract: This study investigated the belief held by over 50% of parous women that they are more forgetful during pregnancy and postpartum relative to other times. Comparisons were made between both the reported and objective memory performances of three groups of women (n = 20 per group), (1) primigravid, (2) primiparous (baby younger than 12 months), and (3) never been pregnant, matched on age and education levels. Participants completed a questionnaire on demographic, health, and sleep details, the Inventory of Memor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
53
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
9
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of previous studies have asked only for ratings of general memory ability (Brindle et al, 1991;Casey et al, 1999;Christensen et al, 1999;Janes et al, 1999;McDowell and Moriarty, 2000;Sharp et al, 1993). Those that have examined other aspects of cognition Kane et al, 1968;Parsons and Redman, 1991;Poser et al, 1986) have shown that in addition to memory difficulties, some pregnant women also report increased absentmindedness and impairments in concentration, reading ability and clarity of thought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of previous studies have asked only for ratings of general memory ability (Brindle et al, 1991;Casey et al, 1999;Christensen et al, 1999;Janes et al, 1999;McDowell and Moriarty, 2000;Sharp et al, 1993). Those that have examined other aspects of cognition Kane et al, 1968;Parsons and Redman, 1991;Poser et al, 1986) have shown that in addition to memory difficulties, some pregnant women also report increased absentmindedness and impairments in concentration, reading ability and clarity of thought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welch, 1991). Evidence for such an impairment has not always been forthcoming from studies using objective measures of cognitive performance (Christensen et al, 1999) and sometimes the evidence has been contradictory (Brindle et al, 1991;McDowell and Moriarty, 2000;Sharp et al, 1993;Janes et al, 1999). Even where measurable changes have been apparent, the performance of the pregnant women is still often within the normal range Keenan et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data from our previous study of implicit memory across the lifespan [30] indicate a slight female advantage on CEG priming (P =0.06) and a significant advantage on conceptual explicit memory (see Appendix A). Conversely, studies of memory during pregnancy lead to the speculation that unusually high levels of sex steroid hormones may detrimentally affect performance on both explicit and implicit memory tests [5,7,23,42]. Pregnancy is characterized by dramatic hormonal fluctuations, including unusually high levels of estrogen, progesterone, oxytocin, and other hormones [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…word-stem completion). Two studies reported impairments among pregnant women [5,42], and two other studies found no difference between pregnant and nonpregnant women on the test [7,23]. Isolating and understanding the influence of estrogen on memory in pregnancy is difficult because the hormonal milieu is complex and fluctuates throughout pregnancy and the relation between estrogen levels and memory performance may be nonlinear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%