2005
DOI: 10.1177/0090591705280658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory in Native American Land Claims

Abstract: While claims for the return of expropriated land by Native Americans and other indigenous peoples are often evaluated using legal frameworks, such approaches fail to engage the fundamental moral questions involved. This essay outlines three justifications for Native Americans to pursue land claims: to regain properties where original ownership has not been superseded, to aid the long-term survival of their endangered cultures, and to challenge and revise the historical misremembering of mainstream American soc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The divergence between indigenous people and the imposing authority regarding ownership rights and land tenure has posed and still poses dilemmas for many indigenous groups around the world, including the Sami (cf. brøsted, 1986;Thomas, 1988;Korpijaako-labba, 1994;olund, 2002;Villamarín and Villamarín, 2003;Hendrix, 2005;Hierro, 2005;Suluk and blakney, 2008).…”
Section: Comparative Perspectives On Indigenous Peoples' Land Use Durmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The divergence between indigenous people and the imposing authority regarding ownership rights and land tenure has posed and still poses dilemmas for many indigenous groups around the world, including the Sami (cf. brøsted, 1986;Thomas, 1988;Korpijaako-labba, 1994;olund, 2002;Villamarín and Villamarín, 2003;Hendrix, 2005;Hierro, 2005;Suluk and blakney, 2008).…”
Section: Comparative Perspectives On Indigenous Peoples' Land Use Durmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some theorists argue that the horrors of nationalism, or its incompatibility with liberalism, mean that we need to move past nationalism toward a post‐nationalist world, where the nation state is not a primary political unit (Abizadeh, 2004; Gans, 2003; Habermas, 1998; 2001; Mason, 2000). Other theorists argue that historical injustice is something that cannot be ignored, however, and that it calls for a response by the political community (for some examples, see Hendrix, 2005; Hill, 2002; Ivison, 2000; McCarthy, 2002; 2004; Ridge, 2003; Thompson, 2002). Few of these theorists lay blame for historical injustice on nationalism, but many do argue that national communities are responsible for remembering and correcting these past injustices.…”
Section: Collective Memories and The Dangers Of Post‐nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indigenous movements in Bolivia were first mobilized in a quest for land in the context of the 1953 land reform. In the following decades, they gradually engaged in a deep‐reaching enterprise of memory and cultural reconstruction that influenced their social, political and economic lives, leading them to claim land and territories (Hendrix 2005; Gilbert 2006; Chihuailaf 2008). Although Bolivia's indigenous groups are heterogeneous in terms of their interest in the spatial dimension of land, the formulation of a common demand for territories led them to forge strong alliances among themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%