2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00305-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory impairment in schizophrenia: a study using event-related potentials in implicit and explicit tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kiang and Kutas (2005) found that individuals high in schizotypy showed larger (i.e., more negative) N400s to both high-and low-typicality exemplars, suggesting lower than normal activation of stimuli semantically related to the preceding category names; they also found smaller (i.e., less negative) N400s to non-exemplars, indicating higher than normal activation of unrelated items. The second aspect of the contextual deficit hypothesis is that schizophrenic patients might be less able to utilise semantic information from the previous encoding phase to modify the latency of their responses to repeated stimuli (Guillem et al, 2001;Jeong & Kubicki, 2010;Matsuoka et al, 1999). For example, the schizophrenic patients tested by Matsuoka and colleagues (1999) did not show significant changes in the amplitude of the N400s associated with repeated words in a semantic categorisation task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kiang and Kutas (2005) found that individuals high in schizotypy showed larger (i.e., more negative) N400s to both high-and low-typicality exemplars, suggesting lower than normal activation of stimuli semantically related to the preceding category names; they also found smaller (i.e., less negative) N400s to non-exemplars, indicating higher than normal activation of unrelated items. The second aspect of the contextual deficit hypothesis is that schizophrenic patients might be less able to utilise semantic information from the previous encoding phase to modify the latency of their responses to repeated stimuli (Guillem et al, 2001;Jeong & Kubicki, 2010;Matsuoka et al, 1999). For example, the schizophrenic patients tested by Matsuoka and colleagues (1999) did not show significant changes in the amplitude of the N400s associated with repeated words in a semantic categorisation task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One meta-analysis found that non-word stimuli yielded even larger effect sizes of compromised recognition memory performance in schizophrenia (Pelletier et al, 2005), and old/new ERP abnormalities in schizophrenia have been reported for unfamiliar faces that are difficult to verbalize (Guillem et al, 2001). To further address these issues of material specificity in a within-subjects design, we are now recording ERPs of larger samples of schizophrenia patients and healthy adults during continuous recognition memory tasks using both words and unfamiliar faces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guillem et al (2001) studied ERP old/new effects in 15 schizophrenia patients and 15 healthy controls during a continuous recognition memory paradigm with unfamiliar faces under implicit (indicate the gender) and explicit (item previously presented) task instructions. Using a 13-channel EEG montage referenced to the right ear lobe, reduced old/new effects were reported in patients over medial parietal sites for the implicit task at about 300 ms, overlapping a relative negative ERP deflection (N300), but not at about 500 ms, overlapping a late positive complex (P500).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The N400 appears to be abnormal in schizophrenia (Koyama et al 1991;Niznikiewicz et al 1999;Sitnikova et al 2002), especially as thought disorder or cognitive disorganization increases (Andrews et al 1993). P600 amplitude is also smaller in schizophrenia patients than in controls, although schizophrenia patients who frequently experience reality distortion (i.e., hallucinations and delusions) show significantly larger (i.e., relatively more intact) P600 amplitudes than schizophrenia patients who do not experience prominent reality distortion (Guillem et al 2001;2003). Thus, the P600 effect is consistent with P&S's interpretation of gamma in schizophrenia, which is also thought to reflect episodic binding and is less impaired in schizophrenia patients who frequently experience reality distortion.…”
Section: Guarding Against Over-inclusive Notionsmentioning
confidence: 90%