2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory formation, consolidation and transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
162
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
162
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although memory formation does not follow a strict step-wise sequence (Nadel et al, 2012), the later description of how reward motivation affects memory refers to distinct processes, as proposed by Nadel et al (2012): (1) encoding, (2) consolidation, (3) recollection (which may lead to reconsolidation, update or disruption of memory), and (4) later transformation.…”
Section: Declarative Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although memory formation does not follow a strict step-wise sequence (Nadel et al, 2012), the later description of how reward motivation affects memory refers to distinct processes, as proposed by Nadel et al (2012): (1) encoding, (2) consolidation, (3) recollection (which may lead to reconsolidation, update or disruption of memory), and (4) later transformation.…”
Section: Declarative Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Müller & Pilzecker, 1900; Nadel, Hupbach, Gomez, & Newman-Smith, 2012). This consolidation period takes up to six hours (Nader, 2003) and during this period the memory trace is still labile and vulnerable to interference (Nader, 2003; Walker, Brakefield, Hobson, & Stickgold, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, the hippocampal role is reduced as the neocortical areas form direct connections, until in some cases at least, the memory trace eventually becomes independent of the hippocampus (Frankland & Bontempi, 2005;Nadel, Hupbach, Gomez, & Newman-Smith, 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%