2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6114-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory for Melodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, item characteristics as modeled by the computational features predicted implicit and explicit memory performance in people both with absolutely no training and those with some training. This finding is in line with a number of prior studies (summarized in Halpern & Bartlett, 2010) showing that performance in standard memory paradigms for melodies are relatively insensitive to specific training (or the innate skills) of musicians.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, item characteristics as modeled by the computational features predicted implicit and explicit memory performance in people both with absolutely no training and those with some training. This finding is in line with a number of prior studies (summarized in Halpern & Bartlett, 2010) showing that performance in standard memory paradigms for melodies are relatively insensitive to specific training (or the innate skills) of musicians.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This suggests that explicit memory tasks might be more dependent on individual encoding strategies and incidental associations than implicit memory. Learning novel melodic items in a sequential paradigm is a difficult task (see Halpern & Bartlett, 2010, for a review) often resulting in modest Features and Context 429 memory scores. It would thus be interesting to see whether feature models for explicit and implicit memory would substantially differ for data from an experimental paradigm with multiple exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall memory performance did not improve over the three listening sessions but, with increasing exposure, performance became worse, and confidence became lower, for unpredictable stimuli. This suggests that participants were learning the statistical regularities describing the stimuli rather than the particular exemplars themselves (Cleeremans et al, 1998;Halpern & Bartlett, 2010;Loui et al, 2010;Saffran et al, 1999;Stadler & Frensch, 1998). Had we used fewer and/or more brief stimuli, recognition memory performance might have been better (see Loui & Wessel, 2008), but this would also likely have resulted in less abstraction of the underlying statistical relationships across stimuli (Cleeremans et al, 1998).…”
Section: Recognition Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memory retention through music seems to be amongst the most enduring of all memory types (Halpern & Bartlett, 2010).…”
Section: Simon Faulknermentioning
confidence: 99%